1987 version
ISO 9000:1987 had the same structure as the UK Standard BS 5750, with three ‘models’ for quality management systems, the selection of which was based on the scope of activities of the organization:
ISO 9001:1987 Model for quality assurance in design, development, production, installation, and servicing was for companies and organizations whose activities included the creation of new products.
ISO 9002:1987 Model for quality assurance in production, installation, and servicing had basically the same material as ISO 9001 but without covering the creation of new products.
ISO 9003:1987 Model for quality assurance in final inspection and test covered only the final inspection of finished product, with no concern for how the product was produced.
ISO 9000:1987
1994 version
was also influenced by existing U.S. and other Defense Standards (”MIL SPECS”), and so was well-suited to manufacturing. The emphasis tended to be placed on conformance with procedures rather than the overall process of management—which was likely the actual intent.ISO 9000:19942000 version
emphasized quality assurance via preventive actions, instead of just checking final product, and continued to require evidence of compliance with documented procedures. As with the first edition, the down-side was that companies tended to implement its requirements by creating shelf-loads of procedure manuals, and becoming burdened with an ISO bureaucracy. In some companies, adapting and improving processes could actually be impeded by the quality system.ISO 9001:2000
The ISO 9000 standard is continually being revised by standing technical committees and advisory groups, who receive feedback from those professionals who are implementing the standard.2008 version
ISO 9001:2008 only introduces clarifications to the existing requirements of ISO 9001:2000 and some changes intended to improve consistency with ISO 14001:2004. There are no new requirements. Explanation of changes in ISO 9001:2008. A Practical Guide to ISO 9001:2008 Implementation A quality management system being upgraded just needs to be checked to see if it is following the clarifications introduced in the amended version.
combines the three standards 9001, 9002, and 9003 into one, called 9001. Design and development procedures are required only if a company does in fact engage in the creation of new products. The 2000 version sought to make a radical change in thinking by actually placing the concept of process management front and center (”Process management” was the monitoring and optimizing of a company’s tasks and activities, instead of just inspecting the final product). The 2000 version also demands involvement by upper executives, in order to integrate quality into the business system and avoid delegation of quality functions to junior administrators. Another goal is to improve effectiveness via process performance metrics — numerical measurement of the effectiveness of tasks and activities. Expectations of continual process improvement and tracking customer satisfaction were made explicit.
Friday, October 9, 2009
ISO 9000 — a way of managing for conformance
Quality assurance, according to the Standard, is a way of managing that prevents non-conformance and thus “assures quality”. This is what makes ISO 9000 different from other standards: it is a management standard, not a product standard. It goes beyond product standardisation: it is standardising not what is made but how it is made. To use standards to dictate and control how organisations work was to extend the role of standards to new territory. To take such a step we might have firstly established that any such requirements worked — that they resulted in ways of working which improved performance.
Yet the plausibility of this Standard, and the fact that those who had an interest in maintaining it were (and still are) leading opinion, prevented such enquiries. In simple terms the Standard asks managers to say what they do, do what they say and prove it to a third party.
ISO 9000 (1994) paragraph 1: “The requirements specified are aimed primarily at achieving customer satisfaction by preventing non-conformity at all stages from design through servicing.”
To put it another way, the Standard asserts that preventing non-conformance achieves customer satisfaction. But does it? Of course it matters to customers that a product works. But there is no guarantee that the Standard will ensure even that. Furthermore, customers take a total view of an organisation — how easy it is to do business with — in respect of all things of importance to each and every customer.
ISO 9000 requires managers to “establish and maintain a documented quality system as a means of ensuring that product conforms to specified requirements”. Loosely translated this is “say what you do”. Management is supposed to “define and document its policy for quality . . . including its commitment to quality”.
What management would not declare its commitment to quality? But would they know what it means? Would they argue (as they should) that quality management is a different and better way to do business, or would they believe that ISO 9000 will take care of quality? The Standard encourages managers to think of “quality” and “business as usual” as separate and distinct. It helps managers avoid the revelation that quality means a wholly different view of management. Instead, the organisation “shall appoint a management representative who, irrespective of other responsibilities, shall have defined authority and responsibility” [for ISO 9000]. At a practical level this means only one executive might decide he or she had better learn a thing or two about quality. However, would being responsible for ISO 9000 lead to learning about quality or simply enforcing the ISO 9000 regime in an organisation?
Key to the regime is auditing. The Standard requires organisations to conduct internal quality audits to “verify whether quality activities comply with planned arrangements”. This can be loosely translated as “do you do as you say?” and the purpose of the audit is to see that you do. It was not until the 1994 review that the words were changed to “quality activities and related results”. It was a Standard which was rooted in the philosophy of inspection: fifteen years after its initial promulgation the promoters sought to extend the focus to results. But results or improvements assessed by what means? Inspection. By the time the Standard was adopted world-wide, quality thinking had moved a long way from the philosophy of inspection. It is now understood, at least by a few, that quality is achieved through managing the organisation as a system and using measures which enable managers to improve flow and reduce variation (which we explore in chapters 5 and 7). The defenders argue that there is nothing stopping a company having ISO 9000 and implementing methods for managing flow and reducing variation, but where are such companies? Few of the companies we researched, formally and informally, knew anything about this thinking. The Standard does not talk about it; moreover, the Standard effectively discourages managers from learning about it by representing quality in a different way.
According to ISO 8402 (quality vocabulary), quality is:
“The totality of features and characteristics of a product or service that bear on its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs.”
Everything we have learned about ISO 9000 suggests that the people who created this definition were thinking about the things which need to be controlled, those things which “bear on its ability . . .”. The builders of the Standard assumed that customer needs would be listed in contractual agreements between the supplier and customer. ISO 9000 has a “make” logic — procedures for “how you do what you do” — and a “control” logic — check to see that it is done. It is a relic of the era when contractual agreements were perceived to be an important device for regulating the behaviour of suppliers. In these ways, ISO 9000 encouraged “planning for quality”.
Planning for quality sounds plausible, but it assumes many things: that the plan is the right plan, that it is feasible, that people will “do it”, that performance will improve. It is an approach which, paradoxically, leads to poor decisions. Planners of quality systems, guided by ISO 9000, start with a view of how the world should be as framed by the Standard. Understanding how an organisation is working, rather than how someone thinks it should, is a far better place from which to start change of any kind.
Yet the plausibility of this Standard, and the fact that those who had an interest in maintaining it were (and still are) leading opinion, prevented such enquiries. In simple terms the Standard asks managers to say what they do, do what they say and prove it to a third party.
ISO 9000 (1994) paragraph 1: “The requirements specified are aimed primarily at achieving customer satisfaction by preventing non-conformity at all stages from design through servicing.”
To put it another way, the Standard asserts that preventing non-conformance achieves customer satisfaction. But does it? Of course it matters to customers that a product works. But there is no guarantee that the Standard will ensure even that. Furthermore, customers take a total view of an organisation — how easy it is to do business with — in respect of all things of importance to each and every customer.
ISO 9000 requires managers to “establish and maintain a documented quality system as a means of ensuring that product conforms to specified requirements”. Loosely translated this is “say what you do”. Management is supposed to “define and document its policy for quality . . . including its commitment to quality”.
What management would not declare its commitment to quality? But would they know what it means? Would they argue (as they should) that quality management is a different and better way to do business, or would they believe that ISO 9000 will take care of quality? The Standard encourages managers to think of “quality” and “business as usual” as separate and distinct. It helps managers avoid the revelation that quality means a wholly different view of management. Instead, the organisation “shall appoint a management representative who, irrespective of other responsibilities, shall have defined authority and responsibility” [for ISO 9000]. At a practical level this means only one executive might decide he or she had better learn a thing or two about quality. However, would being responsible for ISO 9000 lead to learning about quality or simply enforcing the ISO 9000 regime in an organisation?
Key to the regime is auditing. The Standard requires organisations to conduct internal quality audits to “verify whether quality activities comply with planned arrangements”. This can be loosely translated as “do you do as you say?” and the purpose of the audit is to see that you do. It was not until the 1994 review that the words were changed to “quality activities and related results”. It was a Standard which was rooted in the philosophy of inspection: fifteen years after its initial promulgation the promoters sought to extend the focus to results. But results or improvements assessed by what means? Inspection. By the time the Standard was adopted world-wide, quality thinking had moved a long way from the philosophy of inspection. It is now understood, at least by a few, that quality is achieved through managing the organisation as a system and using measures which enable managers to improve flow and reduce variation (which we explore in chapters 5 and 7). The defenders argue that there is nothing stopping a company having ISO 9000 and implementing methods for managing flow and reducing variation, but where are such companies? Few of the companies we researched, formally and informally, knew anything about this thinking. The Standard does not talk about it; moreover, the Standard effectively discourages managers from learning about it by representing quality in a different way.
According to ISO 8402 (quality vocabulary), quality is:
“The totality of features and characteristics of a product or service that bear on its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs.”
Everything we have learned about ISO 9000 suggests that the people who created this definition were thinking about the things which need to be controlled, those things which “bear on its ability . . .”. The builders of the Standard assumed that customer needs would be listed in contractual agreements between the supplier and customer. ISO 9000 has a “make” logic — procedures for “how you do what you do” — and a “control” logic — check to see that it is done. It is a relic of the era when contractual agreements were perceived to be an important device for regulating the behaviour of suppliers. In these ways, ISO 9000 encouraged “planning for quality”.
Planning for quality sounds plausible, but it assumes many things: that the plan is the right plan, that it is feasible, that people will “do it”, that performance will improve. It is an approach which, paradoxically, leads to poor decisions. Planners of quality systems, guided by ISO 9000, start with a view of how the world should be as framed by the Standard. Understanding how an organisation is working, rather than how someone thinks it should, is a far better place from which to start change of any kind.
ISO 9000 — a way of managing for conformance
Quality assurance, according to the Standard, is a way of managing that prevents non-conformance and thus “assures quality”. This is what makes ISO 9000 different from other standards: it is a management standard, not a product standard. It goes beyond product standardisation: it is standardising not what is made but how it is made. To use standards to dictate and control how organisations work was to extend the role of standards to new territory. To take such a step we might have firstly established that any such requirements worked — that they resulted in ways of working which improved performance.
Yet the plausibility of this Standard, and the fact that those who had an interest in maintaining it were (and still are) leading opinion, prevented such enquiries. In simple terms the Standard asks managers to say what they do, do what they say and prove it to a third party.
ISO 9000 (1994) paragraph 1: “The requirements specified are aimed primarily at achieving customer satisfaction by preventing non-conformity at all stages from design through servicing.”
To put it another way, the Standard asserts that preventing non-conformance achieves customer satisfaction. But does it? Of course it matters to customers that a product works. But there is no guarantee that the Standard will ensure even that. Furthermore, customers take a total view of an organisation — how easy it is to do business with — in respect of all things of importance to each and every customer.
ISO 9000 requires managers to “establish and maintain a documented quality system as a means of ensuring that product conforms to specified requirements”. Loosely translated this is “say what you do”. Management is supposed to “define and document its policy for quality . . . including its commitment to quality”.
What management would not declare its commitment to quality? But would they know what it means? Would they argue (as they should) that quality management is a different and better way to do business, or would they believe that ISO 9000 will take care of quality? The Standard encourages managers to think of “quality” and “business as usual” as separate and distinct. It helps managers avoid the revelation that quality means a wholly different view of management. Instead, the organisation “shall appoint a management representative who, irrespective of other responsibilities, shall have defined authority and responsibility” [for ISO 9000]. At a practical level this means only one executive might decide he or she had better learn a thing or two about quality. However, would being responsible for ISO 9000 lead to learning about quality or simply enforcing the ISO 9000 regime in an organisation?
Key to the regime is auditing. The Standard requires organisations to conduct internal quality audits to “verify whether quality activities comply with planned arrangements”. This can be loosely translated as “do you do as you say?” and the purpose of the audit is to see that you do. It was not until the 1994 review that the words were changed to “quality activities and related results”. It was a Standard which was rooted in the philosophy of inspection: fifteen years after its initial promulgation the promoters sought to extend the focus to results. But results or improvements assessed by what means? Inspection. By the time the Standard was adopted world-wide, quality thinking had moved a long way from the philosophy of inspection. It is now understood, at least by a few, that quality is achieved through managing the organisation as a system and using measures which enable managers to improve flow and reduce variation (which we explore in chapters 5 and 7). The defenders argue that there is nothing stopping a company having ISO 9000 and implementing methods for managing flow and reducing variation, but where are such companies? Few of the companies we researched, formally and informally, knew anything about this thinking. The Standard does not talk about it; moreover, the Standard effectively discourages managers from learning about it by representing quality in a different way.
According to ISO 8402 (quality vocabulary), quality is:
“The totality of features and characteristics of a product or service that bear on its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs.”
Everything we have learned about ISO 9000 suggests that the people who created this definition were thinking about the things which need to be controlled, those things which “bear on its ability . . .”. The builders of the Standard assumed that customer needs would be listed in contractual agreements between the supplier and customer. ISO 9000 has a “make” logic — procedures for “how you do what you do” — and a “control” logic — check to see that it is done. It is a relic of the era when contractual agreements were perceived to be an important device for regulating the behaviour of suppliers. In these ways, ISO 9000 encouraged “planning for quality”.
Planning for quality sounds plausible, but it assumes many things: that the plan is the right plan, that it is feasible, that people will “do it”, that performance will improve. It is an approach which, paradoxically, leads to poor decisions. Planners of quality systems, guided by ISO 9000, start with a view of how the world should be as framed by the Standard. Understanding how an organisation is working, rather than how someone thinks it should, is a far better place from which to start change of any kind.
Yet the plausibility of this Standard, and the fact that those who had an interest in maintaining it were (and still are) leading opinion, prevented such enquiries. In simple terms the Standard asks managers to say what they do, do what they say and prove it to a third party.
ISO 9000 (1994) paragraph 1: “The requirements specified are aimed primarily at achieving customer satisfaction by preventing non-conformity at all stages from design through servicing.”
To put it another way, the Standard asserts that preventing non-conformance achieves customer satisfaction. But does it? Of course it matters to customers that a product works. But there is no guarantee that the Standard will ensure even that. Furthermore, customers take a total view of an organisation — how easy it is to do business with — in respect of all things of importance to each and every customer.
ISO 9000 requires managers to “establish and maintain a documented quality system as a means of ensuring that product conforms to specified requirements”. Loosely translated this is “say what you do”. Management is supposed to “define and document its policy for quality . . . including its commitment to quality”.
What management would not declare its commitment to quality? But would they know what it means? Would they argue (as they should) that quality management is a different and better way to do business, or would they believe that ISO 9000 will take care of quality? The Standard encourages managers to think of “quality” and “business as usual” as separate and distinct. It helps managers avoid the revelation that quality means a wholly different view of management. Instead, the organisation “shall appoint a management representative who, irrespective of other responsibilities, shall have defined authority and responsibility” [for ISO 9000]. At a practical level this means only one executive might decide he or she had better learn a thing or two about quality. However, would being responsible for ISO 9000 lead to learning about quality or simply enforcing the ISO 9000 regime in an organisation?
Key to the regime is auditing. The Standard requires organisations to conduct internal quality audits to “verify whether quality activities comply with planned arrangements”. This can be loosely translated as “do you do as you say?” and the purpose of the audit is to see that you do. It was not until the 1994 review that the words were changed to “quality activities and related results”. It was a Standard which was rooted in the philosophy of inspection: fifteen years after its initial promulgation the promoters sought to extend the focus to results. But results or improvements assessed by what means? Inspection. By the time the Standard was adopted world-wide, quality thinking had moved a long way from the philosophy of inspection. It is now understood, at least by a few, that quality is achieved through managing the organisation as a system and using measures which enable managers to improve flow and reduce variation (which we explore in chapters 5 and 7). The defenders argue that there is nothing stopping a company having ISO 9000 and implementing methods for managing flow and reducing variation, but where are such companies? Few of the companies we researched, formally and informally, knew anything about this thinking. The Standard does not talk about it; moreover, the Standard effectively discourages managers from learning about it by representing quality in a different way.
According to ISO 8402 (quality vocabulary), quality is:
“The totality of features and characteristics of a product or service that bear on its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs.”
Everything we have learned about ISO 9000 suggests that the people who created this definition were thinking about the things which need to be controlled, those things which “bear on its ability . . .”. The builders of the Standard assumed that customer needs would be listed in contractual agreements between the supplier and customer. ISO 9000 has a “make” logic — procedures for “how you do what you do” — and a “control” logic — check to see that it is done. It is a relic of the era when contractual agreements were perceived to be an important device for regulating the behaviour of suppliers. In these ways, ISO 9000 encouraged “planning for quality”.
Planning for quality sounds plausible, but it assumes many things: that the plan is the right plan, that it is feasible, that people will “do it”, that performance will improve. It is an approach which, paradoxically, leads to poor decisions. Planners of quality systems, guided by ISO 9000, start with a view of how the world should be as framed by the Standard. Understanding how an organisation is working, rather than how someone thinks it should, is a far better place from which to start change of any kind.
ISO 9000 vs Quality
ISO 9000 was conceived to bring about an improvement in product quality. It
was believed that if organizations were able to demonstrate they were
operating a quality system that met international standards, customers would
gain greater confidence in the quality of products they purchased. It was also
believed that by operating in accordance with documented procedures, errors
would be reduced and consistency of output ensured. If you find the best way
of achieving a result, put in place measures to prevent variation, document it
and train others to apply it, it follows that the results produced should be
consistently good.
The requirements of the standard were perceived to be a list of things to do
to achieve quality. The ISO co-ordinator would often draw up a plan based on
the following logic:
1. We have to identify resource requirements so I will write a procedure on
identifying resource requirements
2. We have to produce quality plans so I will write a procedure on producing
quality plans
3. We have to record contract review so I will write a procedure on recording
contract reviews
4. We have to identify design changes so I will write a procedure on identifying
design changes
The requirements in the standard were often not expressed as results to be
achieved. Requirements for a documented procedure to be established resulted
in just that. Invariably the objectives of the procedure were to define something
rather than to achieve something. This led to documentation without any clear
purpose that related to the achievement of quality. Those producing the
documentation were focusing on meeting the standard not on achieving quality.
Those producing the product were focusing on meeting the customer
requirement but the two were often out of sync. As quality assurance became
synonymous with procedures, so people perceived that they could achieve
quality by following procedures. The dominance of procedures to the exclusion
of performance is a misunderstanding of the implementers. The standard
required a documented system that ensured product met specified requirements – a
clear purpose. Once again the implementers lost sight of the objective. Or was it
that they knew the objective but in order to meet it, the culture would have to
change and if they could get the badge without doing so, why should they?
Issuing a procedure was considered to equate to task completed. Unfortu-
nately, for those on the receiving end, the procedures were filed and forgotten.
When the auditor came around, the individual was found to be totally
unaware of the ‘procedure’ and consequently found noncompliant with it.
However, the auditor would discover that the individual was doing the right
things so the corrective action was inevitably to change the procedure. The
process of issuing procedures was not questioned, the individual concerned
was blamed for not knowing the procedure and the whole episode failed to
make any positive contribution to the achievement of quality. But it left the
impression on the individual that quality was all about following procedures.
It also left the impression that quality was about consistency and providing
you did what you said you would do regardless of it being in the interests of
satisfying customers, it was OK. One is left wondering whether anyone
consulted the dictionary in which quality is defined as a degree of excellence?
Another problem was that those who were to implement requirements were
often excluded from the process. Instead of enquiring as to the best way of
meeting a requirement, those in charge of ISO 9000 implementation assumed
that issuing procedures would in fact cause compliance with requirements. It
requires a study of the way work gets done to appreciate how best to meet a
requirement. Procedures were required to be documented and the range and
detail was intended to be appropriate to the complexity of the work, the
methods used and the skills and training needed. The standard also only
required work instructions where their absence would adversely affect quality.
It is as though the people concerned did not read the requirement properly or
had no curiosity to find out for themselves what ISO had to say about
procedures – they were all too ready to be told what to do without questioning
why they should be doing it.
More often than not, the topics covered by the standard were only a sample
of all the things that need to be done to achieve the organization’s objectives.
The way the standard classified the topics was also often not appropriate to the
way work was performed. As a consequence, procedures failed to be
implemented because they mirrored the standard and not the work. ISO 9000
may have required documented procedures but it did not insist that they be
produced in separate documents, with titles or an identification convention
that was traceable to the requirements.
Critics argue (Seddon, John, 2000)3 that ISO 9000 did not enable organiza-
tions to reduce variation as a result of following the procedures. It is true that
ISO 9000 did not explain the theory of variation – it could have done, but
perhaps it was felt that this was better handled by the wealth of literature
available at the time. However, ISO 9000 did require organizations to identify
where the use of statistical techniques was necessary for establishing,
controlling and verifying process capability but this was often misunderstood.
Clause 4.14 of ISO 9001 required corrective action procedures – procedures to
identify variation and eliminate the cause so this should have resulted in a
reduction in variation. The procedures did not always focus on results – they
tended to focus on transactions – sending information or product from A to B.
The concept of corrective action was often misunderstood. It was believed to be
about fixing the problem and preventive action was believed to be about
preventing recurrence. Had users read ISO 8402 they should have been
enlightened. Had they read Deming they would have been enlightened but in
many cases the language of ISO 9000 was a deterrent to learning. Had the
auditors understood variation, they too could have assisted in clarifying these
issues but they too seemed ignorant – willing to regard clause 4.20 as not
applicable in many cases.
Clause 4.6 of the undervalued and forgotten standard ISO 9000 –1 starts with
‘The International Standards in the ISO 9000 family are founded upon the
understanding that all work is accomplished by a process.’ In clause 4.7 it starts
with ‘Every organization exists to accomplish value-adding work. The work is
accomplished through a network of processes’ In clause 4.8 it starts with ‘It is
conventional to speak of quality systems as consisting of a number of elements.
The quality system is carried out by means of processes which exist both within
and across functions’ Alas, few people read ISO 9000–1 and as a result the
baggage that had amassed was difficult to shed especially because there were
few if any certification bodies suggesting that the guidance contained in ISO
9000 –1 should be applied. Unfortunately, this message from ISO 9000 –1 was not
conveyed through the requirements of ISO 9001. ISO 9001 was not intended as
a design tool. It was produced for contractual and assessment purposes but was
used as a design tool instead of ISO 9000 –1 and ISO 9004 –1.
was believed that if organizations were able to demonstrate they were
operating a quality system that met international standards, customers would
gain greater confidence in the quality of products they purchased. It was also
believed that by operating in accordance with documented procedures, errors
would be reduced and consistency of output ensured. If you find the best way
of achieving a result, put in place measures to prevent variation, document it
and train others to apply it, it follows that the results produced should be
consistently good.
The requirements of the standard were perceived to be a list of things to do
to achieve quality. The ISO co-ordinator would often draw up a plan based on
the following logic:
1. We have to identify resource requirements so I will write a procedure on
identifying resource requirements
2. We have to produce quality plans so I will write a procedure on producing
quality plans
3. We have to record contract review so I will write a procedure on recording
contract reviews
4. We have to identify design changes so I will write a procedure on identifying
design changes
The requirements in the standard were often not expressed as results to be
achieved. Requirements for a documented procedure to be established resulted
in just that. Invariably the objectives of the procedure were to define something
rather than to achieve something. This led to documentation without any clear
purpose that related to the achievement of quality. Those producing the
documentation were focusing on meeting the standard not on achieving quality.
Those producing the product were focusing on meeting the customer
requirement but the two were often out of sync. As quality assurance became
synonymous with procedures, so people perceived that they could achieve
quality by following procedures. The dominance of procedures to the exclusion
of performance is a misunderstanding of the implementers. The standard
required a documented system that ensured product met specified requirements – a
clear purpose. Once again the implementers lost sight of the objective. Or was it
that they knew the objective but in order to meet it, the culture would have to
change and if they could get the badge without doing so, why should they?
Issuing a procedure was considered to equate to task completed. Unfortu-
nately, for those on the receiving end, the procedures were filed and forgotten.
When the auditor came around, the individual was found to be totally
unaware of the ‘procedure’ and consequently found noncompliant with it.
However, the auditor would discover that the individual was doing the right
things so the corrective action was inevitably to change the procedure. The
process of issuing procedures was not questioned, the individual concerned
was blamed for not knowing the procedure and the whole episode failed to
make any positive contribution to the achievement of quality. But it left the
impression on the individual that quality was all about following procedures.
It also left the impression that quality was about consistency and providing
you did what you said you would do regardless of it being in the interests of
satisfying customers, it was OK. One is left wondering whether anyone
consulted the dictionary in which quality is defined as a degree of excellence?
Another problem was that those who were to implement requirements were
often excluded from the process. Instead of enquiring as to the best way of
meeting a requirement, those in charge of ISO 9000 implementation assumed
that issuing procedures would in fact cause compliance with requirements. It
requires a study of the way work gets done to appreciate how best to meet a
requirement. Procedures were required to be documented and the range and
detail was intended to be appropriate to the complexity of the work, the
methods used and the skills and training needed. The standard also only
required work instructions where their absence would adversely affect quality.
It is as though the people concerned did not read the requirement properly or
had no curiosity to find out for themselves what ISO had to say about
procedures – they were all too ready to be told what to do without questioning
why they should be doing it.
More often than not, the topics covered by the standard were only a sample
of all the things that need to be done to achieve the organization’s objectives.
The way the standard classified the topics was also often not appropriate to the
way work was performed. As a consequence, procedures failed to be
implemented because they mirrored the standard and not the work. ISO 9000
may have required documented procedures but it did not insist that they be
produced in separate documents, with titles or an identification convention
that was traceable to the requirements.
Critics argue (Seddon, John, 2000)3 that ISO 9000 did not enable organiza-
tions to reduce variation as a result of following the procedures. It is true that
ISO 9000 did not explain the theory of variation – it could have done, but
perhaps it was felt that this was better handled by the wealth of literature
available at the time. However, ISO 9000 did require organizations to identify
where the use of statistical techniques was necessary for establishing,
controlling and verifying process capability but this was often misunderstood.
Clause 4.14 of ISO 9001 required corrective action procedures – procedures to
identify variation and eliminate the cause so this should have resulted in a
reduction in variation. The procedures did not always focus on results – they
tended to focus on transactions – sending information or product from A to B.
The concept of corrective action was often misunderstood. It was believed to be
about fixing the problem and preventive action was believed to be about
preventing recurrence. Had users read ISO 8402 they should have been
enlightened. Had they read Deming they would have been enlightened but in
many cases the language of ISO 9000 was a deterrent to learning. Had the
auditors understood variation, they too could have assisted in clarifying these
issues but they too seemed ignorant – willing to regard clause 4.20 as not
applicable in many cases.
Clause 4.6 of the undervalued and forgotten standard ISO 9000 –1 starts with
‘The International Standards in the ISO 9000 family are founded upon the
understanding that all work is accomplished by a process.’ In clause 4.7 it starts
with ‘Every organization exists to accomplish value-adding work. The work is
accomplished through a network of processes’ In clause 4.8 it starts with ‘It is
conventional to speak of quality systems as consisting of a number of elements.
The quality system is carried out by means of processes which exist both within
and across functions’ Alas, few people read ISO 9000–1 and as a result the
baggage that had amassed was difficult to shed especially because there were
few if any certification bodies suggesting that the guidance contained in ISO
9000 –1 should be applied. Unfortunately, this message from ISO 9000 –1 was not
conveyed through the requirements of ISO 9001. ISO 9001 was not intended as
a design tool. It was produced for contractual and assessment purposes but was
used as a design tool instead of ISO 9000 –1 and ISO 9004 –1.
Quality Characteristic in ISO 9000
Any feature or characteristic of a product or service that is needed to satisfy
customer needs or achieve fitness for use is a quality characteristic. When
dealing with products the characteristics are almost always technical character-
istics, whereas service quality characteristics have a human dimension. Some
typical quality characteristics are given below.
Product characteristics
1. Accessibility Functionality Size
2. Availability Interchangeability Susceptibility
3. Appearance Maintainability Storability
4. Adaptability Odour – Strength
5. Cleanliness Operability -Taste
6. Consumption Portability – Testability
7. Durability Producibility Traceability
8. Disposability Reliability – Toxicity
9. Emittance Reparability Transportability
10. Flammability Safety – Vulnerability
11. Flexibility Security – Weight
Service quality characteristics
1. Accessibility Credibility – Honesty
2. Accuracy Dependability Promptness
3. Courtesy Efficiency – Responsiveness
4. Comfort Effectiveness Reliability
5. Competence Flexibility – Security
These are the characteristics that need to be specified and their achievement
controlled, assured, improved, managed and demonstrated. These are the
characteristics that form the subject matter of the product requirements
referred to in ISO 9000. When the value of these characteristics is quantified or
qualified they are termed product requirements. We used to use the term quality
requirements but this caused a division in thinking that resulted in people
regarding quality requirements as the domain of the quality personnel and
technical requirements being the domain of the technical personnel. All
requirements are quality requirements – they express needs or expectations that
are intended to be fulfilled by a process output that possesses inherent
characteristics. We can therefore drop the word quality. If a modifying word is
needed in front of the word requirements it should be a word that signifies the
subject of the requirements. Transportation system requirements would be
requirements for a transportation system, Audio speaker design requirements
would be requirements for the design of an audio speaker, component test
requirements would be requirements for testing components, and management
training requirements would be requirements for training managers. ISO 9000
requirements are often referred to as quality requirements as distinct from other
types of requirements but this is misleading. ISO 9000 is no more a quality
requirement than is ISO 1000 on SI units, ISO 2365 for Ammonium nitrate or
ISO 246 for Rolling Bearings. The requirements of ISO 9000 are quality
management system requirements – requirements for a quality management
system.
customer needs or achieve fitness for use is a quality characteristic. When
dealing with products the characteristics are almost always technical character-
istics, whereas service quality characteristics have a human dimension. Some
typical quality characteristics are given below.
Product characteristics
1. Accessibility Functionality Size
2. Availability Interchangeability Susceptibility
3. Appearance Maintainability Storability
4. Adaptability Odour – Strength
5. Cleanliness Operability -Taste
6. Consumption Portability – Testability
7. Durability Producibility Traceability
8. Disposability Reliability – Toxicity
9. Emittance Reparability Transportability
10. Flammability Safety – Vulnerability
11. Flexibility Security – Weight
Service quality characteristics
1. Accessibility Credibility – Honesty
2. Accuracy Dependability Promptness
3. Courtesy Efficiency – Responsiveness
4. Comfort Effectiveness Reliability
5. Competence Flexibility – Security
These are the characteristics that need to be specified and their achievement
controlled, assured, improved, managed and demonstrated. These are the
characteristics that form the subject matter of the product requirements
referred to in ISO 9000. When the value of these characteristics is quantified or
qualified they are termed product requirements. We used to use the term quality
requirements but this caused a division in thinking that resulted in people
regarding quality requirements as the domain of the quality personnel and
technical requirements being the domain of the technical personnel. All
requirements are quality requirements – they express needs or expectations that
are intended to be fulfilled by a process output that possesses inherent
characteristics. We can therefore drop the word quality. If a modifying word is
needed in front of the word requirements it should be a word that signifies the
subject of the requirements. Transportation system requirements would be
requirements for a transportation system, Audio speaker design requirements
would be requirements for the design of an audio speaker, component test
requirements would be requirements for testing components, and management
training requirements would be requirements for training managers. ISO 9000
requirements are often referred to as quality requirements as distinct from other
types of requirements but this is misleading. ISO 9000 is no more a quality
requirement than is ISO 1000 on SI units, ISO 2365 for Ammonium nitrate or
ISO 246 for Rolling Bearings. The requirements of ISO 9000 are quality
management system requirements – requirements for a quality management
system.
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
Implementing A Quality Management System
Implementing A Quality Management System
An ISO 9000:2008 quality management system can be implemented by following the steps detailed as follows:
1. Evaluate the organization’s need/goals for implementing a QMS Need may arise from repeated customer complaints; frequent warranty returns; delayed deliveries; high inventories; frequent production hold-ups; and high level of rework or rejection of products or services.
At this stage, identify the goals which you would like to achieve through a QMS, such as customer satisfaction, increased market share, improved communications and morale in the organization, greater efficiency and profitability, etc. Another objective in implementing a QMS may be a demonstration of compliance through third party certification, which may be requested by an important client or required for enlisting as a supplier to large companies, e.g., original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).
2. Obtain information about the ISO 9000 family
The persons identified for initiating the development of an ISO 9000 QMS need tounderstand the requirements of ISO 9001:2008 as read with ISO 9000:2000 and ISO 9001:2008.
Supporting information such as quality management principles, frequently asked questions (FAQs), guidance on clause 1.2 (application) of ISO 9001:2008, guidance on documentation requirements of ISO 9001:2008 and other brochures are available free of charge on the ISO web site;
3. Appoint a consultant, if necessary
If, within the organization, you do not have adequate competence to develop a QMS, you may appoint a consultant. Before doing so, it is good to check his/her background; knowledge about the product realization processes of your organization; and experience in helping other organizations to achieve their stated goals, including certification.
Carry out a cost-benefit analysis of hiring a consultant and agree the scope of his/her work in writing. It is also possible to appoint a consultant only for the training of key staff; the latter can then carry out further training and development of the system.
4. Awareness and training
Raise awareness about QMS requirements amongst all personnel performing activities that affect quality. Plan for and provide specific training on how to develop Quality Manuals; on procedures; on QMS planning; on how to identify and implement improvement processes; and on how to audit compliance with the QMS, etc.
The Institute of Quality Assurance (IQA), the American Society for Quality (ASQ)and the International Auditor and Training Certification Association (IATCA) can provide lists of training organizations.
5. Gap analysis
Evaluate gaps between your existing quality management system and the QMS requirements of ISO 9001. Prepare how to bridge these gaps, including by planning for any additional resources required. Gap analysis may be carried out through selfassessment or by the external consultant.
6. Product realization processes
Review clause 7 of ISO 9001:2008 relating to “Product realization” to determine how the requirements apply or do not apply to your company’s QMS.
The processes covered by this clause include:
• Customer-related processes
• Design and development
• Purchasing
• Production and service provision
• Control of measuring and monitoring devices
Note that if your company is not responsible for preparing the design of your product, you can exclude the requirement for “design and development” from your QMS and explain the reasons for doing so in your Quality Manual.
7. Staffing
Decide on the responsibilities of the persons who will be involved in developing and documenting the QMS, including the appointment of a management representative who will oversee the implementation of the QMS. Establishing a project Steering Committee may also prove useful to oversee progress and provide resources wherever required.
8. Planning a time frame
Prepare a complete plan to close the gaps identified in Step 5 to develop the QMS processes. In the plan, include activities to be performed, resources required, responsibilities and an estimated completion time for each activity. Clauses 4.1 and
7.1 of ISO 9001:2008 provide information that should be used when developing the plan. The total time required for each phase (planning, documentation, implementation and evaluation) depends on the extent of the gaps in your existing QMS.
9. Draft a Quality Manual
In your Quality Manual;
• Include how the QMS applies to the products, processes, locations and departments of the organization;
• Exclude any requirement with justification for doing so as decided in step 6
above;
• Refer to or include documented procedures for QMS;
• Describe the interaction between the processes of the QMS, e.g., the interaction between product realization processes and other management, measurement and improvement processes; and
• Draft the quality policy and quality objectives for the organization.
The staff concerned in the organization should review the Quality Manual and the documented procedures so that their comments and suggestions can be taken into account before the Quality Manual and procedures are approved for issue and use.
The effective date of implementation should also be decided.
10. Carry out internal audits
During the phase of implementation of some three to six months after the documentation has been written, the trained auditors should carry out one or two internal audits covering all activities for the QMS, and concerned management should take corrective action on the audit findings without delay. Wherever required, revise the manuals, procedures and objectives. After each internal audit, the top management should review the effectiveness of the system and provide necessary resources for corrective actions and improvements.
11. Apply for certification
On satisfactory completion of Step 10, and if your company decides to obtain third party certification, you can make an application for certification to an accredited certification body. The certification audit process is explained section VII.
12. Conduct periodic evaluations
After certification, the organization should periodically conduct internal audits to review the effectiveness of the QMS and see how it can be “continually improved”. The organization should evaluate periodically if the purpose and goals (see Step 1) for which the QMS was developed are being achieved, including its continual improvement.
An ISO 9000:2008 quality management system can be implemented by following the steps detailed as follows:
1. Evaluate the organization’s need/goals for implementing a QMS Need may arise from repeated customer complaints; frequent warranty returns; delayed deliveries; high inventories; frequent production hold-ups; and high level of rework or rejection of products or services.
At this stage, identify the goals which you would like to achieve through a QMS, such as customer satisfaction, increased market share, improved communications and morale in the organization, greater efficiency and profitability, etc. Another objective in implementing a QMS may be a demonstration of compliance through third party certification, which may be requested by an important client or required for enlisting as a supplier to large companies, e.g., original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).
2. Obtain information about the ISO 9000 family
The persons identified for initiating the development of an ISO 9000 QMS need tounderstand the requirements of ISO 9001:2008 as read with ISO 9000:2000 and ISO 9001:2008.
Supporting information such as quality management principles, frequently asked questions (FAQs), guidance on clause 1.2 (application) of ISO 9001:2008, guidance on documentation requirements of ISO 9001:2008 and other brochures are available free of charge on the ISO web site;
3. Appoint a consultant, if necessary
If, within the organization, you do not have adequate competence to develop a QMS, you may appoint a consultant. Before doing so, it is good to check his/her background; knowledge about the product realization processes of your organization; and experience in helping other organizations to achieve their stated goals, including certification.
Carry out a cost-benefit analysis of hiring a consultant and agree the scope of his/her work in writing. It is also possible to appoint a consultant only for the training of key staff; the latter can then carry out further training and development of the system.
4. Awareness and training
Raise awareness about QMS requirements amongst all personnel performing activities that affect quality. Plan for and provide specific training on how to develop Quality Manuals; on procedures; on QMS planning; on how to identify and implement improvement processes; and on how to audit compliance with the QMS, etc.
The Institute of Quality Assurance (IQA), the American Society for Quality (ASQ)and the International Auditor and Training Certification Association (IATCA) can provide lists of training organizations.
5. Gap analysis
Evaluate gaps between your existing quality management system and the QMS requirements of ISO 9001. Prepare how to bridge these gaps, including by planning for any additional resources required. Gap analysis may be carried out through selfassessment or by the external consultant.
6. Product realization processes
Review clause 7 of ISO 9001:2008 relating to “Product realization” to determine how the requirements apply or do not apply to your company’s QMS.
The processes covered by this clause include:
• Customer-related processes
• Design and development
• Purchasing
• Production and service provision
• Control of measuring and monitoring devices
Note that if your company is not responsible for preparing the design of your product, you can exclude the requirement for “design and development” from your QMS and explain the reasons for doing so in your Quality Manual.
7. Staffing
Decide on the responsibilities of the persons who will be involved in developing and documenting the QMS, including the appointment of a management representative who will oversee the implementation of the QMS. Establishing a project Steering Committee may also prove useful to oversee progress and provide resources wherever required.
8. Planning a time frame
Prepare a complete plan to close the gaps identified in Step 5 to develop the QMS processes. In the plan, include activities to be performed, resources required, responsibilities and an estimated completion time for each activity. Clauses 4.1 and
7.1 of ISO 9001:2008 provide information that should be used when developing the plan. The total time required for each phase (planning, documentation, implementation and evaluation) depends on the extent of the gaps in your existing QMS.
9. Draft a Quality Manual
In your Quality Manual;
• Include how the QMS applies to the products, processes, locations and departments of the organization;
• Exclude any requirement with justification for doing so as decided in step 6
above;
• Refer to or include documented procedures for QMS;
• Describe the interaction between the processes of the QMS, e.g., the interaction between product realization processes and other management, measurement and improvement processes; and
• Draft the quality policy and quality objectives for the organization.
The staff concerned in the organization should review the Quality Manual and the documented procedures so that their comments and suggestions can be taken into account before the Quality Manual and procedures are approved for issue and use.
The effective date of implementation should also be decided.
10. Carry out internal audits
During the phase of implementation of some three to six months after the documentation has been written, the trained auditors should carry out one or two internal audits covering all activities for the QMS, and concerned management should take corrective action on the audit findings without delay. Wherever required, revise the manuals, procedures and objectives. After each internal audit, the top management should review the effectiveness of the system and provide necessary resources for corrective actions and improvements.
11. Apply for certification
On satisfactory completion of Step 10, and if your company decides to obtain third party certification, you can make an application for certification to an accredited certification body. The certification audit process is explained section VII.
12. Conduct periodic evaluations
After certification, the organization should periodically conduct internal audits to review the effectiveness of the QMS and see how it can be “continually improved”. The organization should evaluate periodically if the purpose and goals (see Step 1) for which the QMS was developed are being achieved, including its continual improvement.
ISO 9001 Standards – Management Review
ISO 9001 Standards – Management Review
Review the quality management system at planned intervals to:- Assess possible opportunities for improvementEnsure a suitable, adequate, and effective system
- Evaluate the need for any changes to the system
- Consider the need for changes to the quality policy and objectives
Maintain records of the management reviews.
Inputs for management review must include information on:
- Results of audits
- Customer feedback
- Process performance and product conformity
- Status of preventive and corrective actions
- Follow-up actions from earlier reviews
- Changes that could affect the quality system
- Recommendations for improvement
Outputs from the management review must include any decisions and actions related to:
- Improvement of the effectiveness of the quality management system and its processes
- Improvement of product related to customer requirements
- Resource needs
Review the quality management system at planned intervals to:- Assess possible opportunities for improvementEnsure a suitable, adequate, and effective system
- Evaluate the need for any changes to the system
- Consider the need for changes to the quality policy and objectives
Maintain records of the management reviews.
Inputs for management review must include information on:
- Results of audits
- Customer feedback
- Process performance and product conformity
- Status of preventive and corrective actions
- Follow-up actions from earlier reviews
- Changes that could affect the quality system
- Recommendations for improvement
Outputs from the management review must include any decisions and actions related to:
- Improvement of the effectiveness of the quality management system and its processes
- Improvement of product related to customer requirements
- Resource needs
ISO 9001 Standards – Design and Development
ISO 9001 Standards - Design and Development
Plan and control the product design and development. This planning must determine the:Identify problems and propose any necessary actions
- Stages of design and development
- Appropriate review, verification, and validation activities for each stage
- Responsibility and authority for design and development
The interfaces between the different involved groups must be managed to ensure effective communication and the clear assignment of responsibility. Update, as appropriate, the planning output during design and development.
NOTE: Design and development review, verification, and validation have distinct purposes. They can be conducted and recorded separately or in any combination, as deemed suitable for the product and the organization.
Determine product requirement inputs and maintain records. The inputs must include:
- Functional and performance requirements
- Applicable statutory and regulatory requirements
- Applicable information derived from similar designs
- Requirements essential for design and development
Review these inputs for adequacy. Resolve any incomplete, ambiguous, or conflicting requirements.
Document the outputs of the design and development process in a form suitable for verification against the inputs to the process. The outputs must:
- Meet design and development input requirements
- Provide information for purchasing, production, and service
- Contain or reference product acceptance criteria
- Define essential characteristics for safe and proper use
- Be approved before their release
Perform systematic reviews of design and development at suitable stages in accordance with planned arrangements to:
- Evaluate the ability of the results to meet requirements
- The reviews must include representatives of the functions concerned with the stage being reviewed. Maintain the results of reviews and subsequent follow-up actions.
Plan and control the product design and development. This planning must determine the:Identify problems and propose any necessary actions
- Stages of design and development
- Appropriate review, verification, and validation activities for each stage
- Responsibility and authority for design and development
The interfaces between the different involved groups must be managed to ensure effective communication and the clear assignment of responsibility. Update, as appropriate, the planning output during design and development.
NOTE: Design and development review, verification, and validation have distinct purposes. They can be conducted and recorded separately or in any combination, as deemed suitable for the product and the organization.
Determine product requirement inputs and maintain records. The inputs must include:
- Functional and performance requirements
- Applicable statutory and regulatory requirements
- Applicable information derived from similar designs
- Requirements essential for design and development
Review these inputs for adequacy. Resolve any incomplete, ambiguous, or conflicting requirements.
Document the outputs of the design and development process in a form suitable for verification against the inputs to the process. The outputs must:
- Meet design and development input requirements
- Provide information for purchasing, production, and service
- Contain or reference product acceptance criteria
- Define essential characteristics for safe and proper use
- Be approved before their release
Perform systematic reviews of design and development at suitable stages in accordance with planned arrangements to:
- Evaluate the ability of the results to meet requirements
- The reviews must include representatives of the functions concerned with the stage being reviewed. Maintain the results of reviews and subsequent follow-up actions.
ISO 9001 Standards – Control of Measuring and Monitoring Equipment
ISO 9001 Standards - Control of Measuring and Monitoring Equipment
Determine the monitoring and measurements to be made, and the required equipment, to provide evidence of product conformity. Use and control the monitoring and measuring devices to ensure that measurement capability is consistent with monitoring and measurement requirements.
Where necessary to ensure valid results:
- Calibrate and/or verify the measuring equipment at specified intervals or prior to use
- Calibrate the equipment to national or international standards (or record other basis)
- Adjust or re-adjust as necessary
- Identify the measuring equipment in order to determine its calibration status
- Safeguard them from improper adjustments
- Protect them from damage and deterioration
Assess and record the validity of prior results if the device is found to not conform to requirements. Maintain records of the calibration and verification results.
Confirm the ability of software used for monitoring and measuring for the intended application before its initial use (and reconfirmed as necessary).
NOTE: Confirming the ability of software to satisfy the intended application would typically include its verification and configuration management to maintain its suitability for use.
For More Information Please Visit http://www.iso9001-standard.us
Determine the monitoring and measurements to be made, and the required equipment, to provide evidence of product conformity. Use and control the monitoring and measuring devices to ensure that measurement capability is consistent with monitoring and measurement requirements.
Where necessary to ensure valid results:
- Calibrate and/or verify the measuring equipment at specified intervals or prior to use
- Calibrate the equipment to national or international standards (or record other basis)
- Adjust or re-adjust as necessary
- Identify the measuring equipment in order to determine its calibration status
- Safeguard them from improper adjustments
- Protect them from damage and deterioration
Assess and record the validity of prior results if the device is found to not conform to requirements. Maintain records of the calibration and verification results.
Confirm the ability of software used for monitoring and measuring for the intended application before its initial use (and reconfirmed as necessary).
NOTE: Confirming the ability of software to satisfy the intended application would typically include its verification and configuration management to maintain its suitability for use.
For More Information Please Visit http://www.iso9001-standard.us
ISO 14001:2004 Standards Contents
ISO 14001:2004 Standards
ISO 14000 is a series of international standards on environmental management. It provides a framework for the development of an environmental management system and the supporting audit programme.
The main thrust for its development came as a result of the Rio Summit on the Environment held in 1992.
ISO 14000 is an Environmental Management System (EMS), which requires that an organization consider the environmental aspects of its products and services.
Iso14000 approach forces you to take a hard look at all areas of your business that has an environmental impact.
Iso14000 is the world’s first series of Internationally accepted Standards for Environmental Management Systems (EMS).
Iso14000 elevates Environmental Management to a Strategic Level that can be applied to any organization, from any industry, anywhere in the world.
ISO 14000 is a series of voluntary standards and guideline reference documents.
The part of the overall management system that includes organizational structure, planning activities, responsibilities, practices, procedures, processes and resources for developing, implementing, achieving, reviewing and maintaining the environmental policy.
Iso14000 is the world’s first series of Internationally accepted Standards for Environmental Management Systems (EMS).
Iso14000 elevates Environmental Management to a Strategic Level that can be applied to any organization, from any industry, anywhere in the world.
ISO 14000 is a series of voluntary standards and guideline reference documents.
The part of the overall management system that includes organizational structure, planning activities, responsibilities, practices, procedures, processes and resources for developing, implementing, achieving, reviewing and maintaining the environmental policy.
ISO 14000 is an Environmental Management System (EMS) who’s purpose is:
· A management commitment to pollution prevention.
· An understanding of the environmental impacts (reducing) of an organization’s activities.
A commitment (pollution prevention) to employees, neighbors and customers
ISO 14001 is the corner stone standard of the ISO 14000 series. It specifies a framework of control for an Environmental Management System against which an organization can be certified by a third party.
The environment cannot be protected by our convictions or goodwill alone. Efforts to protect the environment must be planned, coordinated and organized into a system, such as ISO 14001.
ISO14001 requires an Environmental Policy to be in existence within the organisation, fully supported by senior management, and outlining the policies of the company, not only to the staff but to the public. The policy needs to clarify compliance with Environmental Legislation that may effect the organization and stress a commitment to continuous improvement. Emphasis has been placed on policy as this provides the direction for the remainder of the Management System.
Those companies who have witnessed ISO9000 Assessments will know that the policy is frequently discussed during the assessment, many staff are asked if they understand or are aware of the policy, and any problems associated with the policy are seldom serious. The Environmental Policy is different, this provides the initial foundation and direction for the Management System and will be more stringently reviewed than a similar ISO9000 policy. The statement must be publicised in non-technical language so that it can be understood by the majority of readers. It should relate to the sites within the organisation encompassed by the Management System, it should provide an overview of the company’s activities on the site and a description of those activities. A clear picture of the company’s operations.
The preparatory review and definition of the organization’s environmental effects is not part of a ISO14001 Assessment, however examination of this data will provide an external audit with a wealth of information on the methods adopted by the company. The preparatory review itself should be comprehensive in consideration of input processes and output at the site. This review should be designed to identify all relevant environmental aspects that may arise from existence on the site. These may relate to current operations, they may relate to future, perhaps even unplanned future activities, and they will certainly relate to the activities performed on site in the past (i.e. contamination of land).
The initial or preparatory review will also include a wide-ranging consideration of the legislation which may effect the site, whether it is currently being complied with, and perhaps even whether copies of the legislation are available. Many of the environmental assessments undertaken already have highlighted that companies are often unaware of ALL of the legislation that affects them, and being unaware, are often not meeting the requirements of that legislation.
The company will declare its primary environmental objectives, those that can have most environmental impact. In order to gain most benefit these will become the primary areas of consideration within the improvement process, and the company’s environmental program. The program will be the plan to achieve specific goals or targets along the route to a specific goal and describe the means to reach those objectives such that they are real and achievable. The Environmental Management System provides further detail on the environmental program. The EMS establishes procedures, work instructions and controls to ensure that implementation of the policy and achievement of the targets can become a reality. Communication is a vital factor, enabling people in the organisation to be aware of their responsibilities, aware of the objectives of the scheme, and able to contribute to its success.
As with ISO9000 the Environmental Management System requires a planned comprehensive periodic audit of the Environmental Management System to ensure that it is effective in operation, is meeting specified goals, and the system continues to perform in accordance with relevant regulations and standards. The audits are designed to provide additional information in order to exercise effective management of the system, providing information on practices which differ to the current procedures or offer an opportunity for improvement.
In addition to audit, there is a requirement for Management Review of the system to ensure that it is suitable (for the organization and the objectives) and effective in operation. The management review is the ideal forum to make decisions on howe to improve for the future.
The newly revised ISO 14001:2004 specifies the requirements for an environmental management system (EMS), which provides a framework for an organization to control the environmental impacts of its activities, products and services, and to continually improve its environmental performance. It applies to those environmental aspects which the organization can control and over which it can be expected to have an influence. It does not itself state specific environmental performance criteria. ISO 14001:2004 is applicable to any organization that wishes to:
· implement, maintain and improve an environmental management system
· assure itself of its conformance with its stated environmental policy
· demonstrate such conformance to others
· seek certification/registration of its environmental management system by an external organization
· make a self-determination and self-declaration of conformance with this international standard.
All the requirements in this standard can be incorporated into any environmental management system. Having been revised, the improved ISO 14001 is now expected to bring the benefits of implementing an EMS to more businesses than ever. The standard is now easier to understand and use and has more detailed checklists for inputs and outputs from the management review and has increased compatibility to ISO 9001. Organizations who are currently registered to ISO 14001:1996 will have an 18-month transition period to register to ISO 14001:2004.
ISO 14000 is a series of international standards on environmental management. It provides a framework for the development of an environmental management system and the supporting audit programme.
The main thrust for its development came as a result of the Rio Summit on the Environment held in 1992.
ISO 14000 is an Environmental Management System (EMS), which requires that an organization consider the environmental aspects of its products and services.
Iso14000 approach forces you to take a hard look at all areas of your business that has an environmental impact.
Iso14000 is the world’s first series of Internationally accepted Standards for Environmental Management Systems (EMS).
Iso14000 elevates Environmental Management to a Strategic Level that can be applied to any organization, from any industry, anywhere in the world.
ISO 14000 is a series of voluntary standards and guideline reference documents.
The part of the overall management system that includes organizational structure, planning activities, responsibilities, practices, procedures, processes and resources for developing, implementing, achieving, reviewing and maintaining the environmental policy.
Iso14000 is the world’s first series of Internationally accepted Standards for Environmental Management Systems (EMS).
Iso14000 elevates Environmental Management to a Strategic Level that can be applied to any organization, from any industry, anywhere in the world.
ISO 14000 is a series of voluntary standards and guideline reference documents.
The part of the overall management system that includes organizational structure, planning activities, responsibilities, practices, procedures, processes and resources for developing, implementing, achieving, reviewing and maintaining the environmental policy.
ISO 14000 is an Environmental Management System (EMS) who’s purpose is:
· A management commitment to pollution prevention.
· An understanding of the environmental impacts (reducing) of an organization’s activities.
A commitment (pollution prevention) to employees, neighbors and customers
ISO 14001 is the corner stone standard of the ISO 14000 series. It specifies a framework of control for an Environmental Management System against which an organization can be certified by a third party.
The environment cannot be protected by our convictions or goodwill alone. Efforts to protect the environment must be planned, coordinated and organized into a system, such as ISO 14001.
ISO14001 requires an Environmental Policy to be in existence within the organisation, fully supported by senior management, and outlining the policies of the company, not only to the staff but to the public. The policy needs to clarify compliance with Environmental Legislation that may effect the organization and stress a commitment to continuous improvement. Emphasis has been placed on policy as this provides the direction for the remainder of the Management System.
Those companies who have witnessed ISO9000 Assessments will know that the policy is frequently discussed during the assessment, many staff are asked if they understand or are aware of the policy, and any problems associated with the policy are seldom serious. The Environmental Policy is different, this provides the initial foundation and direction for the Management System and will be more stringently reviewed than a similar ISO9000 policy. The statement must be publicised in non-technical language so that it can be understood by the majority of readers. It should relate to the sites within the organisation encompassed by the Management System, it should provide an overview of the company’s activities on the site and a description of those activities. A clear picture of the company’s operations.
The preparatory review and definition of the organization’s environmental effects is not part of a ISO14001 Assessment, however examination of this data will provide an external audit with a wealth of information on the methods adopted by the company. The preparatory review itself should be comprehensive in consideration of input processes and output at the site. This review should be designed to identify all relevant environmental aspects that may arise from existence on the site. These may relate to current operations, they may relate to future, perhaps even unplanned future activities, and they will certainly relate to the activities performed on site in the past (i.e. contamination of land).
The initial or preparatory review will also include a wide-ranging consideration of the legislation which may effect the site, whether it is currently being complied with, and perhaps even whether copies of the legislation are available. Many of the environmental assessments undertaken already have highlighted that companies are often unaware of ALL of the legislation that affects them, and being unaware, are often not meeting the requirements of that legislation.
The company will declare its primary environmental objectives, those that can have most environmental impact. In order to gain most benefit these will become the primary areas of consideration within the improvement process, and the company’s environmental program. The program will be the plan to achieve specific goals or targets along the route to a specific goal and describe the means to reach those objectives such that they are real and achievable. The Environmental Management System provides further detail on the environmental program. The EMS establishes procedures, work instructions and controls to ensure that implementation of the policy and achievement of the targets can become a reality. Communication is a vital factor, enabling people in the organisation to be aware of their responsibilities, aware of the objectives of the scheme, and able to contribute to its success.
As with ISO9000 the Environmental Management System requires a planned comprehensive periodic audit of the Environmental Management System to ensure that it is effective in operation, is meeting specified goals, and the system continues to perform in accordance with relevant regulations and standards. The audits are designed to provide additional information in order to exercise effective management of the system, providing information on practices which differ to the current procedures or offer an opportunity for improvement.
In addition to audit, there is a requirement for Management Review of the system to ensure that it is suitable (for the organization and the objectives) and effective in operation. The management review is the ideal forum to make decisions on howe to improve for the future.
The newly revised ISO 14001:2004 specifies the requirements for an environmental management system (EMS), which provides a framework for an organization to control the environmental impacts of its activities, products and services, and to continually improve its environmental performance. It applies to those environmental aspects which the organization can control and over which it can be expected to have an influence. It does not itself state specific environmental performance criteria. ISO 14001:2004 is applicable to any organization that wishes to:
· implement, maintain and improve an environmental management system
· assure itself of its conformance with its stated environmental policy
· demonstrate such conformance to others
· seek certification/registration of its environmental management system by an external organization
· make a self-determination and self-declaration of conformance with this international standard.
All the requirements in this standard can be incorporated into any environmental management system. Having been revised, the improved ISO 14001 is now expected to bring the benefits of implementing an EMS to more businesses than ever. The standard is now easier to understand and use and has more detailed checklists for inputs and outputs from the management review and has increased compatibility to ISO 9001. Organizations who are currently registered to ISO 14001:1996 will have an 18-month transition period to register to ISO 14001:2004.
ISO 9001 Standards New Blogs
Some of the new blogs on ISO 9001 Standards & ISO 14001 standards was found as below:
http://iso14000standards.blogspot.com/
http://iso-9001-standards.blogspot.com/
http://iso14001environmentmanagementsystem.blogspot.com/
http://iso9001qualitymanagementsystem.blogspot.com/
http://iso9001qualitymanual.blogspot.com/
http://iso9000standards.blogspot.com/
http://iso9001-standards.blogspot.com/
http://iso14001standards.blogspot.com/
http://iso14000standards.blogspot.com/
http://iso-9001-standards.blogspot.com/
http://iso14001environmentmanagementsystem.blogspot.com/
http://iso9001qualitymanagementsystem.blogspot.com/
http://iso9001qualitymanual.blogspot.com/
http://iso9000standards.blogspot.com/
http://iso9001-standards.blogspot.com/
http://iso14001standards.blogspot.com/
ADVANTAGES ACHIEVED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF Quality Management System
ADVANTAGES ACHIEVED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF Quality Management System (QMS)
- An Romania Perspective
The assurance of quality of the delivered products and services has always represented the main goal of any organisation which wants to be on the market. The concept of „quality” is larger than in the past, referring also to management aspects. Thus, the quality of products and services does not represent only a goal, but a consequence of the quality of the whole managerial activities, workers, and even a quality of partnerships. Modern industrial reorganisations are usually realised through the strategies of quality management, due to the fact that these are able to release the continuous and substantial improvements of the economical agents’ performances.
Within such a frame, one possibility for an organisation to maintain and to gain new positions on a market is to design, to implement and to certificate a Quality Management System (QMS), system through which all processes are controlled.
The Romanian pharmaceutical market is currently restricted as volume and value compared to other countries in the region. Joining the European Union and future improvement of living conditions will mean increase of pharmaceutical expenses per person, considering the fact that the demand for pharmaceutical products (medication) is not influenced by the evolution of prices. After 1990, foreign manufacturers have become interested in the increasing potential of Romania, a country of 22 million inhabitants with a very low intake of drugs per person, due to the low living standard. They have penetrated the market through direct import companies, through license agreements, acquisitions and privatizations.
Romanian manufacturers have tried to shift their direction towards export, but the barrier represented by the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP – for production) and ISO 9001:2000 standards (for distribution) has stopped their penetration of new markets. Their exports mainly targeted Russia, Moldova and former socialist countries. Without norms of this kind, also known as standards, today’s international trade would be inconceivable because every product would have to be checked in keeping with individual criteria. Norms, therefore, create comparability.
Nowadays, the external market has, for several companies, the same importance as the domestic one. The conquest of external market is essential because it brings currency, improves commercial balance, creates new working places and promotes the managerial or technological know-how transfer.
ISO 9000 is a generic name given to a family of standards developed to provide a framework around which a quality management system can be effectively implemented. These standards were developed mainly to facilitate commercial relationships and to increase the confidence of consumers in the capability of a supplier to constantly satisfy the requirements of products and services quality.
The paper presents some advantages achieved by implementation of Quality Management System in pharmaceutical industry, namely S.C. X Company S.A from Tirgu-Mures, one of the most important producer and distributor of pharmaceutical products in Romania.
Using a proven management system combined with ongoing external validation, enables the X Company to continually renew its strategies, domestic and external operations and service level. To this respect, the paper presents the main steps in implementing the Quality Management System within this organisation and some benefits of the registration such as increasing domestic sales, but most off all, the penetration and increasing sales on external markets.
The ISO 9000 family of standards represents an international consensus on good quality management practices. It consists of standards and guidelines related to quality management systems and related supporting standards.
ISO 9001:2000 is the standard that provides a set of standardized requirements for a quality management system, regardless of what the user organization does, its size, or whether it is in the private, or public sector. It is the only standard in the family against which organizations can be certified – although certification is not a compulsory requirement of the standard.
The other standards in the family cover specific aspects such as fundamentals and vocabulary, performance improvements, documentation, training, and financial and economic aspects. Implementing a Quality Management System within an organisation needs to be a decision of top management. The objective of the quality system needs to be clearly defined so that the system can be effective. The design and implementation of quality management system will vary depending on the type, size and products of the organisation and should be used in conjunction with the ISO 9000:2000 standards. Implementing a Quality Management System is not that difficult as it seems, the key is planning and commitment. How complex or simple the QMS is depends entirely on the organisation and what the objectives are. It can be a simple guide to the organisation policy and procedures, or it can document every task and procedure. It really depends on how much risk is involved and how much control is required.
The documentation of QMS involves:
1. The policy to refer to quality, the objectives of quality and the book of quality (Quality Management System)
2. Management Responsibility
3. Resource Management
4. Product Realisation
5. Measurements, Analysis and Improvement
A well managed quality system will have impact on:
1. customer loyalty and repeat business
2. market share
3. operational efficiencies
4. flexibility and ability to respond to market opportunities
5. effective and efficient use of resources
6. cost reductions
7. competitive advantages
- An Romania Perspective
The assurance of quality of the delivered products and services has always represented the main goal of any organisation which wants to be on the market. The concept of „quality” is larger than in the past, referring also to management aspects. Thus, the quality of products and services does not represent only a goal, but a consequence of the quality of the whole managerial activities, workers, and even a quality of partnerships. Modern industrial reorganisations are usually realised through the strategies of quality management, due to the fact that these are able to release the continuous and substantial improvements of the economical agents’ performances.
Within such a frame, one possibility for an organisation to maintain and to gain new positions on a market is to design, to implement and to certificate a Quality Management System (QMS), system through which all processes are controlled.
The Romanian pharmaceutical market is currently restricted as volume and value compared to other countries in the region. Joining the European Union and future improvement of living conditions will mean increase of pharmaceutical expenses per person, considering the fact that the demand for pharmaceutical products (medication) is not influenced by the evolution of prices. After 1990, foreign manufacturers have become interested in the increasing potential of Romania, a country of 22 million inhabitants with a very low intake of drugs per person, due to the low living standard. They have penetrated the market through direct import companies, through license agreements, acquisitions and privatizations.
Romanian manufacturers have tried to shift their direction towards export, but the barrier represented by the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP – for production) and ISO 9001:2000 standards (for distribution) has stopped their penetration of new markets. Their exports mainly targeted Russia, Moldova and former socialist countries. Without norms of this kind, also known as standards, today’s international trade would be inconceivable because every product would have to be checked in keeping with individual criteria. Norms, therefore, create comparability.
Nowadays, the external market has, for several companies, the same importance as the domestic one. The conquest of external market is essential because it brings currency, improves commercial balance, creates new working places and promotes the managerial or technological know-how transfer.
ISO 9000 is a generic name given to a family of standards developed to provide a framework around which a quality management system can be effectively implemented. These standards were developed mainly to facilitate commercial relationships and to increase the confidence of consumers in the capability of a supplier to constantly satisfy the requirements of products and services quality.
The paper presents some advantages achieved by implementation of Quality Management System in pharmaceutical industry, namely S.C. X Company S.A from Tirgu-Mures, one of the most important producer and distributor of pharmaceutical products in Romania.
Using a proven management system combined with ongoing external validation, enables the X Company to continually renew its strategies, domestic and external operations and service level. To this respect, the paper presents the main steps in implementing the Quality Management System within this organisation and some benefits of the registration such as increasing domestic sales, but most off all, the penetration and increasing sales on external markets.
The ISO 9000 family of standards represents an international consensus on good quality management practices. It consists of standards and guidelines related to quality management systems and related supporting standards.
ISO 9001:2000 is the standard that provides a set of standardized requirements for a quality management system, regardless of what the user organization does, its size, or whether it is in the private, or public sector. It is the only standard in the family against which organizations can be certified – although certification is not a compulsory requirement of the standard.
The other standards in the family cover specific aspects such as fundamentals and vocabulary, performance improvements, documentation, training, and financial and economic aspects. Implementing a Quality Management System within an organisation needs to be a decision of top management. The objective of the quality system needs to be clearly defined so that the system can be effective. The design and implementation of quality management system will vary depending on the type, size and products of the organisation and should be used in conjunction with the ISO 9000:2000 standards. Implementing a Quality Management System is not that difficult as it seems, the key is planning and commitment. How complex or simple the QMS is depends entirely on the organisation and what the objectives are. It can be a simple guide to the organisation policy and procedures, or it can document every task and procedure. It really depends on how much risk is involved and how much control is required.
The documentation of QMS involves:
1. The policy to refer to quality, the objectives of quality and the book of quality (Quality Management System)
2. Management Responsibility
3. Resource Management
4. Product Realisation
5. Measurements, Analysis and Improvement
A well managed quality system will have impact on:
1. customer loyalty and repeat business
2. market share
3. operational efficiencies
4. flexibility and ability to respond to market opportunities
5. effective and efficient use of resources
6. cost reductions
7. competitive advantages
ISO 9001 Standards – Documented Procedures
ISO 9001 Standards – Documented Procedures
The standard requires the management system documentation to include documented procedures required by ISO 9001 Standards.
ISO 9000 defines a procedure as a specified way to carry out an activity or a process. This definition is ambiguous because an activity is on a different scale than a process. Process outputs are dependent upon many factors of which activities are but one. An activity is the smallest unit of work. Several activities accomplish a task and several tasks reflect the stages in a process but there is more to a process than a series of tasks. This definition also esults in a belief that procedures are documented processes but this too is inaccurate. Procedures tell us how to proceed don‘t need to produce any others. The specific procedures required are:
(a) A documented procedure for document control
(b) A documented procedure for the control of records
(c) A documented procedure for conducting audits
(d) A documented procedure for nonconformity control
(e) A documented procedure for corrective action
(f) A documented procedure for preventive action
These areas all have something in common. They are what the authors of the early drafts of ISO 9000 :2008 referred to as system procedures ? they apply to the whole system and are not product, process or customer specific although it is not uncommon for customers to specify requirements that would impact these areas. Why procedures for these aspects are required and not for other aspects of the management system is unclear but it seems that the authors of ISO 9000 felt these were not processes ? a conclusion I find difficult to justify.
They are certainly not business processes but could be work processes. However, there is another message that this requirement conveys. It is that procedures are not required for each clause of the standard. Previously, countless organizations produced a manual of 20 procedures to match the 20 elements of ISO 9001. Some limited their procedures to the 26 procedures cited by the standard and others produced as many as were necessary to respond to the requirements.
Document control is a work process or a number of work processes because the inputs pass through a number of stages each adding value to result in the achievement of defined objectives. These are the acquisition, approval, publication, distribution, storage, maintenance, improvement, and disposal stages. These are not tasks but processes that achieve defined objectives and involve both physical, financial and human resources. Within these processes are tasks, each of which may require documented procedures as they are initiated.
Control of records is also a work process similar to document control. There are the preparation, storage, access, maintenance and disposal stages. This is not one uninterrupted flow but a life cycle. There is not one task but several performed at different times for different reasons.
Auditing is certainly a process with a defined objective. Without the provision of competent personnel and a suitable environment, audits will not achieve their objectives no matter how many times the procedure is implemented.
Nonconformity control like records control is a work process for the same reasons. The sequence of tasks is not in the form of an uninterrupted sequence. The sequence of stages may be identification, documentation, segregation, review, remedial action and disposal but this is not a continuous sequence. There are breaks and different procedures may apply at each stage depending on what it is that is nonconforming.
There is little merit in having one corrective action procedure when the source of problems that require corrective action is so varied. One Corrective Action Form might be appropriate but its application will be so varied that it is questionable whether one size fits all. Presenting top management with a nonconformity report because it has been detected that the organization charts are not promptly updated following a change, will not motivate them into action. Corrective action forms part of every process rather than being a separate process. It is unreasonable to force all actions aimed at preventing the recurrence of problems through one process. Many problems are prevented from recurring not by following a procedure, but by the designer, the producer, supplier, manager remembering they had a problem last time and doing it differently the next ? i.e. they learn from their mistakes. No forms filled in, no procedures followed ? just people using their initiative ? this is why corrective action is part of every process operation.
Preventive action remains one of the most misunderstood requirements of ISO 9001 because it is mistaken for corrective action but more on this. There is even less justification for one preventive action procedure because the source of potential problems is so varied. Preventive actions are taken in design, in planning, in training and in maintenance under the name of FMEA, Reliability Prediction, Quality Planning, Production Planning, Logistic Planning, Staff Development, Equipment Maintenance ? preventive actions are built into these processes and similar to corrective action are part of every process design.
The standard requires the management system documentation to include documented procedures required by ISO 9001 Standards.
ISO 9000 defines a procedure as a specified way to carry out an activity or a process. This definition is ambiguous because an activity is on a different scale than a process. Process outputs are dependent upon many factors of which activities are but one. An activity is the smallest unit of work. Several activities accomplish a task and several tasks reflect the stages in a process but there is more to a process than a series of tasks. This definition also esults in a belief that procedures are documented processes but this too is inaccurate. Procedures tell us how to proceed don‘t need to produce any others. The specific procedures required are:
(a) A documented procedure for document control
(b) A documented procedure for the control of records
(c) A documented procedure for conducting audits
(d) A documented procedure for nonconformity control
(e) A documented procedure for corrective action
(f) A documented procedure for preventive action
These areas all have something in common. They are what the authors of the early drafts of ISO 9000 :2008 referred to as system procedures ? they apply to the whole system and are not product, process or customer specific although it is not uncommon for customers to specify requirements that would impact these areas. Why procedures for these aspects are required and not for other aspects of the management system is unclear but it seems that the authors of ISO 9000 felt these were not processes ? a conclusion I find difficult to justify.
They are certainly not business processes but could be work processes. However, there is another message that this requirement conveys. It is that procedures are not required for each clause of the standard. Previously, countless organizations produced a manual of 20 procedures to match the 20 elements of ISO 9001. Some limited their procedures to the 26 procedures cited by the standard and others produced as many as were necessary to respond to the requirements.
Document control is a work process or a number of work processes because the inputs pass through a number of stages each adding value to result in the achievement of defined objectives. These are the acquisition, approval, publication, distribution, storage, maintenance, improvement, and disposal stages. These are not tasks but processes that achieve defined objectives and involve both physical, financial and human resources. Within these processes are tasks, each of which may require documented procedures as they are initiated.
Control of records is also a work process similar to document control. There are the preparation, storage, access, maintenance and disposal stages. This is not one uninterrupted flow but a life cycle. There is not one task but several performed at different times for different reasons.
Auditing is certainly a process with a defined objective. Without the provision of competent personnel and a suitable environment, audits will not achieve their objectives no matter how many times the procedure is implemented.
Nonconformity control like records control is a work process for the same reasons. The sequence of tasks is not in the form of an uninterrupted sequence. The sequence of stages may be identification, documentation, segregation, review, remedial action and disposal but this is not a continuous sequence. There are breaks and different procedures may apply at each stage depending on what it is that is nonconforming.
There is little merit in having one corrective action procedure when the source of problems that require corrective action is so varied. One Corrective Action Form might be appropriate but its application will be so varied that it is questionable whether one size fits all. Presenting top management with a nonconformity report because it has been detected that the organization charts are not promptly updated following a change, will not motivate them into action. Corrective action forms part of every process rather than being a separate process. It is unreasonable to force all actions aimed at preventing the recurrence of problems through one process. Many problems are prevented from recurring not by following a procedure, but by the designer, the producer, supplier, manager remembering they had a problem last time and doing it differently the next ? i.e. they learn from their mistakes. No forms filled in, no procedures followed ? just people using their initiative ? this is why corrective action is part of every process operation.
Preventive action remains one of the most misunderstood requirements of ISO 9001 because it is mistaken for corrective action but more on this. There is even less justification for one preventive action procedure because the source of potential problems is so varied. Preventive actions are taken in design, in planning, in training and in maintenance under the name of FMEA, Reliability Prediction, Quality Planning, Production Planning, Logistic Planning, Staff Development, Equipment Maintenance ? preventive actions are built into these processes and similar to corrective action are part of every process design.
Continual improvement in the quality management system
Continual Improvement In The Quality Management System
The ISO 9001 standard requires the organization to continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system in accordance with the requirements of ISO 9001 and to implement action necessary to achieve planned results and continual improvement of the identified processes.
ISO 9000 defines continual improvement as a recurring activity to increase the ability to fulfil requirements. As the organization’s objectives are its requirements, continually improving the effectiveness of the quality management system means continually increasing the ability of the organization to fulfil its objectives.
If the performance of a process parameter is currently meeting the standard that has been established, there are several improvement actions you can take:
Raise the standard e.g. if the norm for the sales ratio of orders won to all orders bid is 60%, an improvement programme could be developed for raising the standard to 75% or higher
Increase efficiency e.g. if the time to process an order is within limits, identify and eliminate wasted resources
Increase effectiveness e.g. if you bid against all customer requests, by only bidding for those you know you can win you improve your hit rate
You can call all these actions improvement actions because they clearly improve performance. However, we need to distinguish between being better at what we do now and doing new things. Some may argue that improving efficiency is being better at what we do now, and so it is – but if in order to improve efficiency we have to be innovative we are truly reaching new standards. Forty years ago, supervisors in industry would cut an eraser in half in the name of efficiency rather than hand out two erasers. Clearly this was a lack of trust disguised as efficiency improvement and it had quite the opposite effect. In fact they were not only increasing waste but also creating a hostile environment.
Each of the improvement actions is dealt with later in the book and the subject of continual improvement addressed again under Quality planning.
There are several steps to undertaking continual improvement:
1. Determine current performance
2 Establish the need for change
3 Obtain commitment and define the improvement objectives
4 Organize diagnostic resources
5 Carry out research and analysis to discover the cause of current performance
6 Define and test solutions that will accomplish the improvement objectives
7 Product improvement plans which specify how and by whom the changes will be implemented
8 Identify and overcome any resistance to change
9 Implement the change
10 Put in place controls to hold new levels of performance and repeat step one
For more information, please visit http://www.iso9001-standard.us
The ISO 9001 standard requires the organization to continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system in accordance with the requirements of ISO 9001 and to implement action necessary to achieve planned results and continual improvement of the identified processes.
ISO 9000 defines continual improvement as a recurring activity to increase the ability to fulfil requirements. As the organization’s objectives are its requirements, continually improving the effectiveness of the quality management system means continually increasing the ability of the organization to fulfil its objectives.
If the performance of a process parameter is currently meeting the standard that has been established, there are several improvement actions you can take:
Raise the standard e.g. if the norm for the sales ratio of orders won to all orders bid is 60%, an improvement programme could be developed for raising the standard to 75% or higher
Increase efficiency e.g. if the time to process an order is within limits, identify and eliminate wasted resources
Increase effectiveness e.g. if you bid against all customer requests, by only bidding for those you know you can win you improve your hit rate
You can call all these actions improvement actions because they clearly improve performance. However, we need to distinguish between being better at what we do now and doing new things. Some may argue that improving efficiency is being better at what we do now, and so it is – but if in order to improve efficiency we have to be innovative we are truly reaching new standards. Forty years ago, supervisors in industry would cut an eraser in half in the name of efficiency rather than hand out two erasers. Clearly this was a lack of trust disguised as efficiency improvement and it had quite the opposite effect. In fact they were not only increasing waste but also creating a hostile environment.
Each of the improvement actions is dealt with later in the book and the subject of continual improvement addressed again under Quality planning.
There are several steps to undertaking continual improvement:
1. Determine current performance
2 Establish the need for change
3 Obtain commitment and define the improvement objectives
4 Organize diagnostic resources
5 Carry out research and analysis to discover the cause of current performance
6 Define and test solutions that will accomplish the improvement objectives
7 Product improvement plans which specify how and by whom the changes will be implemented
8 Identify and overcome any resistance to change
9 Implement the change
10 Put in place controls to hold new levels of performance and repeat step one
For more information, please visit http://www.iso9001-standard.us
Preparing ISO 9001 Quality Manual
Preparing ISO 9001 Quality Manual
The standard requires a quality manual to be established and maintained that includes the scope of the quality management system, the documented procedures or reference to them and a description of the sequence and interaction of processes included in the quality management system.
ISO 9001 defines a quality manual as a document specifying the quality management system of an organization. It is therefore not intended that the quality manual be a response to the requirements of ISO 9001. As the top-level document describing the management system it is a system description describing how the organization is managed.
Countless quality manuals produced to satisfy ISO 9001:2008, were no more than 20 sections that paraphrased the requirements of the standard. Such documentation adds no value. They are of no use to managers, staff or auditors. Often thought to be useful to customers, organizations would gain no more confidence from customers than would be obtained from their registration certificate.
A description of the management system is necessary as a means of showing how all the processes are interconnected and how they collectively deliver the business outputs. It has several uses as :
1. a means to communicate the vision, values, mission, policies and objectives of the organization
2. a means of showing how the system has been designed
3. a means of showing linkages between processes
4. a means of showing who does what an aid to training new people
5. a tool in the analysis of potential improvements
6. a means of demonstrating compliance with external standards and regulations
When formulating the policies, objectives and identifying the processes to achieve them, the manual provides a convenient vehicle for containing such information. If left as separate pieces of information, it may be more difficult to see the linkages.
The requirement provides the framework for the quality manual. Its content may therefore include the following:
1 Introduction
(a) Purpose (of the manual)
(b) Scope (of the manual)
(c) Applicability (of the manual)
(d) Definitions (of terms used in the manual)
2 Business overview
(a) Nature of the business/organization – its scope of activity, its products and services
(b) The organization’s interested parties (customers, employees, regulators, shareholders, suppliers, owners etc.)
(c) The context diagram showing the organization relative to its external environment
(d) Vision, values
(e) Mission
3 Organization
(a) Function descriptions
(b) Organization chart
(c) Locations with scope of activity
4 Business processes
(a) The system model showing the key business processes and how they are interconnected
(b) System performance indicators and method of measurement
(c) Business planning process description
(d) Resource management process description
(e) Marketing process description
(f) Product/service generation processes description
(g) Sales process description
(h) Order fulfilment process description
5 Function matrix (Relationship of functions to processes)
6 Location matrix (Relationship of locations to processes)
7 Requirement deployment matrices
(a) ISO 9001 compliance matrix
(b) ISO 14001 compliance matrix
(c) Regulation compliance matrices (FDA, Environment, Health, Safety, CAA etc.)
8 Approvals (List of current product, process and system approvals)
The process descriptions can be contained in separate documents and should cover the topics identified previously (see Documents that ensure effective planning, operation and control of processes ).
As the quality manual contains a description of the management system a more apt title would be a Management System Manual (MSM) or maybe a title reflecting its purpose might be Management System Description (MSD).
In addition a much smaller document could be produced that does respond to the requirements of ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and the regulations of regulatory authorities. Each document would be an exposition produced purely to map your management system onto these external requirements to demonstrate how your system meets these requirements. When a new requirement comes along, you can produce a new exposition rather than attempt to change your system to suit all parties. A model of such relationships is illustrated in Figure 4.10. The process descriptions that emerge from the Management System Manual describe the core business processes and are addressed in Chapter 4 under the heading of Documents that ensure effective operation and control of processes.
The standard requires a quality manual to be established and maintained that includes the scope of the quality management system, the documented procedures or reference to them and a description of the sequence and interaction of processes included in the quality management system.
ISO 9001 defines a quality manual as a document specifying the quality management system of an organization. It is therefore not intended that the quality manual be a response to the requirements of ISO 9001. As the top-level document describing the management system it is a system description describing how the organization is managed.
Countless quality manuals produced to satisfy ISO 9001:2008, were no more than 20 sections that paraphrased the requirements of the standard. Such documentation adds no value. They are of no use to managers, staff or auditors. Often thought to be useful to customers, organizations would gain no more confidence from customers than would be obtained from their registration certificate.
A description of the management system is necessary as a means of showing how all the processes are interconnected and how they collectively deliver the business outputs. It has several uses as :
1. a means to communicate the vision, values, mission, policies and objectives of the organization
2. a means of showing how the system has been designed
3. a means of showing linkages between processes
4. a means of showing who does what an aid to training new people
5. a tool in the analysis of potential improvements
6. a means of demonstrating compliance with external standards and regulations
When formulating the policies, objectives and identifying the processes to achieve them, the manual provides a convenient vehicle for containing such information. If left as separate pieces of information, it may be more difficult to see the linkages.
The requirement provides the framework for the quality manual. Its content may therefore include the following:
1 Introduction
(a) Purpose (of the manual)
(b) Scope (of the manual)
(c) Applicability (of the manual)
(d) Definitions (of terms used in the manual)
2 Business overview
(a) Nature of the business/organization – its scope of activity, its products and services
(b) The organization’s interested parties (customers, employees, regulators, shareholders, suppliers, owners etc.)
(c) The context diagram showing the organization relative to its external environment
(d) Vision, values
(e) Mission
3 Organization
(a) Function descriptions
(b) Organization chart
(c) Locations with scope of activity
4 Business processes
(a) The system model showing the key business processes and how they are interconnected
(b) System performance indicators and method of measurement
(c) Business planning process description
(d) Resource management process description
(e) Marketing process description
(f) Product/service generation processes description
(g) Sales process description
(h) Order fulfilment process description
5 Function matrix (Relationship of functions to processes)
6 Location matrix (Relationship of locations to processes)
7 Requirement deployment matrices
(a) ISO 9001 compliance matrix
(b) ISO 14001 compliance matrix
(c) Regulation compliance matrices (FDA, Environment, Health, Safety, CAA etc.)
8 Approvals (List of current product, process and system approvals)
The process descriptions can be contained in separate documents and should cover the topics identified previously (see Documents that ensure effective planning, operation and control of processes ).
As the quality manual contains a description of the management system a more apt title would be a Management System Manual (MSM) or maybe a title reflecting its purpose might be Management System Description (MSD).
In addition a much smaller document could be produced that does respond to the requirements of ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and the regulations of regulatory authorities. Each document would be an exposition produced purely to map your management system onto these external requirements to demonstrate how your system meets these requirements. When a new requirement comes along, you can produce a new exposition rather than attempt to change your system to suit all parties. A model of such relationships is illustrated in Figure 4.10. The process descriptions that emerge from the Management System Manual describe the core business processes and are addressed in Chapter 4 under the heading of Documents that ensure effective operation and control of processes.
Scope Of The Quality Management System
Scope Of The Quality Management System
The ISO 9001 standard requires the quality manual to include the scope of the quality management system including details of justification for any exclusion. The standard addresses activities that may not be relevant or applicable to an organization. The permissible exclusions are explained in section 1.2 of ISO 9001. Here it states that the organization may only exclude requirements that neither affect the organization’s ability, nor its responsibility to provide product that meets customer and applicable regulatory requirements. The requirements for which exclusion is permitted are limited to those in section 7 of the standard.
Under ISO 9001:2008, it was possible for organizations to exclude functions and processes of their organization that may have been difficult to control or were not part of the order fulfilment cycle. Organizations that designed their own products but not for specific customers could escape bringing these operations into the management system. Marketing was omitted because it operated before placement of order. Accounting, Administration, Maintenance, Publicity, Public Relations and After Sales Support functions were often omitted because there were no requirements in the standard that specifically dealt with such activities. As there is no function in an organization that does not directly or indirectly serve the satisfaction of interested parties, it is unlikely that any function or process will now be excluded from the quality management system.
It is sensible to describe the scope of the quality management system so as to ensure effective communication. The scope of the quality management system is one area that generates a lot of misunderstanding particularly when dealing with auditors, consultants and customers. When you claim you have a management system that meets ISO 9001 it could imply that you design, develop, install and service the products you supply, when in fact you may only be a distributor. Why you need to justify specific exclusions is uncertain because it is more practical to justify inclusions.
The scope of the quality management system is the scope of the organization. There is no longer any reason to exclude locations, activities, functions or processes for which there is no requirement in the standard. The reason is because the ISO 9000 family now serves customer satisfaction and is not limited to quality assurance as were the 1994 versions of ISO 9001, ISO 9002 and ISO 9003.
It is not appropriate to address exclusions by inserting pages in the manual corresponding to the sections of the standard and adding justification if not within the scope of the management system – such as ‘We don’t do this!’.
It is much more appropriate to use an appendix as indicated previously in the manual contents list. By describing the nature of the business, you are establishing boundary conditions. If in doing so you do not mention that you design products, it will be interpreted that design is not applicable.
For exclusions relative to detail requirements, the Compliance Matrix may suffice but for an unambiguous solution, it is preferable to produce an exposition that addresses each requirement of the standard.
The ISO 9001 standard requires the quality manual to include the scope of the quality management system including details of justification for any exclusion. The standard addresses activities that may not be relevant or applicable to an organization. The permissible exclusions are explained in section 1.2 of ISO 9001. Here it states that the organization may only exclude requirements that neither affect the organization’s ability, nor its responsibility to provide product that meets customer and applicable regulatory requirements. The requirements for which exclusion is permitted are limited to those in section 7 of the standard.
Under ISO 9001:2008, it was possible for organizations to exclude functions and processes of their organization that may have been difficult to control or were not part of the order fulfilment cycle. Organizations that designed their own products but not for specific customers could escape bringing these operations into the management system. Marketing was omitted because it operated before placement of order. Accounting, Administration, Maintenance, Publicity, Public Relations and After Sales Support functions were often omitted because there were no requirements in the standard that specifically dealt with such activities. As there is no function in an organization that does not directly or indirectly serve the satisfaction of interested parties, it is unlikely that any function or process will now be excluded from the quality management system.
It is sensible to describe the scope of the quality management system so as to ensure effective communication. The scope of the quality management system is one area that generates a lot of misunderstanding particularly when dealing with auditors, consultants and customers. When you claim you have a management system that meets ISO 9001 it could imply that you design, develop, install and service the products you supply, when in fact you may only be a distributor. Why you need to justify specific exclusions is uncertain because it is more practical to justify inclusions.
The scope of the quality management system is the scope of the organization. There is no longer any reason to exclude locations, activities, functions or processes for which there is no requirement in the standard. The reason is because the ISO 9000 family now serves customer satisfaction and is not limited to quality assurance as were the 1994 versions of ISO 9001, ISO 9002 and ISO 9003.
It is not appropriate to address exclusions by inserting pages in the manual corresponding to the sections of the standard and adding justification if not within the scope of the management system – such as ‘We don’t do this!’.
It is much more appropriate to use an appendix as indicated previously in the manual contents list. By describing the nature of the business, you are establishing boundary conditions. If in doing so you do not mention that you design products, it will be interpreted that design is not applicable.
For exclusions relative to detail requirements, the Compliance Matrix may suffice but for an unambiguous solution, it is preferable to produce an exposition that addresses each requirement of the standard.
ISO 9001 Quality Policy
ISO 9001 Quality Policy
The standard requires the quality policy to be appropriate to the purpose of the organization.
The purpose of an organization is quite simply the reason for its existence and as Peter Drucker so eloquently put it there is only one valid definition of business purpose: to create a customer”(Drucker, Peter F., 1977)2 . In ensuring that the quality policy is appropriate to the purpose of the organization, it must be appropriate to the customers the organization desires to create. It is therefore necessary to establish who the customers are, where the customers are, what they buy or wish to receive and what these customers regard as value. As stated above, the quality policy is the corporate policy and such policies exist to channel actions and decisions along a path that will fulfil the organization’s purpose and mission. A goal of the organization may be the attainment of ISO 9001 certification and thus a quality policy of meeting the requirements of ISO 9001 would be consistent with such a goal, but goals are not the same as purpose as indicated in the box to the right. Clearly no organization would have ISO 9001 certification as its purpose because certification is not a reason for existence – an objective maybe but not a purpose.
Policies expressed as short catchy phrases such as “to be the best” really do not channel actions and decisions. They become the focus of ridicule when the organization’s fortunes change. There has to be a clear link from mission to quality policy.
Policies are not expressed as vague statements or emphatic statements using the words may, should or shall, but clear intentions by use of the words ‘we will’
– thus expressing a commitment or by the words ‘we are, we do, we don’t, we have’ expressing shared beliefs. Very short statements tend to become slogans which people chant but rarely understand the impact on what they do. Their virtue is that they rarely become outdated. Long statements confuse people because they contain too much for them to remember. Their virtue is that they not only define what the company stands for but how it will keep its promises.
In the ISO 9001 definition of quality policy it is suggested that the eight quality management principles be used as a basis for establishing the quality policy.
One of these principles is the Customer Focus principle. By including in the quality policy the intention to identify and satisfy the needs and expectations of customers and other interested parties and the associated strategy by which this will be achieved, this requirement would be fulfilled. The inclusion of the strategy is important because the policy should guide action and decision. Omitting the strategy may not ensure uniformity of approach and direction.
The standard requires that the quality policy include a commitment to comply with requirements and continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system.
A commitment to comply with requirements means that the organization should undertake to meet the requirements of all interested parties. This means meeting the requirements of customer, suppliers, employees, investors, owners and society. Customer requirements are those either specified or implied by customers or determined by the organization and these are dealt with in more detail under clauses 5.2 and 7.2.1. The requirements of employees are those covered by legislation such as access, space, environmental conditions, equal opportunities and maternity leave but also the legislation appropriate to minority groups such as the disabled and any agreements made with unions or other representative bodies. Investors have rights also and these will be addressed in the investment agreements. The requirements of society are those obligations resulting from laws, statutes, regulations etc.
An organization accepts such obligations when it is incorporated as a legal entity, when it accepts orders from customers, when it recruits employees, when it chooses to trade in regulated markets and when it chooses to use or process materials that impact the environment.
The effectiveness of the management system is judged by the extent to which it fulfils its purpose. Therefore improving effectiveness means improving the capability of the management system. Changes to the management system that improve its capability i.e its ability to deliver outputs that satisfy all the interested parties, are a certain types of change and not all management system changes will accomplish this. This requirement therefore requires top management to pursue changes that bring about an improvement in performance.
The standard requires the quality policy to be appropriate to the purpose of the organization.
The purpose of an organization is quite simply the reason for its existence and as Peter Drucker so eloquently put it there is only one valid definition of business purpose: to create a customer”(Drucker, Peter F., 1977)2 . In ensuring that the quality policy is appropriate to the purpose of the organization, it must be appropriate to the customers the organization desires to create. It is therefore necessary to establish who the customers are, where the customers are, what they buy or wish to receive and what these customers regard as value. As stated above, the quality policy is the corporate policy and such policies exist to channel actions and decisions along a path that will fulfil the organization’s purpose and mission. A goal of the organization may be the attainment of ISO 9001 certification and thus a quality policy of meeting the requirements of ISO 9001 would be consistent with such a goal, but goals are not the same as purpose as indicated in the box to the right. Clearly no organization would have ISO 9001 certification as its purpose because certification is not a reason for existence – an objective maybe but not a purpose.
Policies expressed as short catchy phrases such as “to be the best” really do not channel actions and decisions. They become the focus of ridicule when the organization’s fortunes change. There has to be a clear link from mission to quality policy.
Policies are not expressed as vague statements or emphatic statements using the words may, should or shall, but clear intentions by use of the words ‘we will’
– thus expressing a commitment or by the words ‘we are, we do, we don’t, we have’ expressing shared beliefs. Very short statements tend to become slogans which people chant but rarely understand the impact on what they do. Their virtue is that they rarely become outdated. Long statements confuse people because they contain too much for them to remember. Their virtue is that they not only define what the company stands for but how it will keep its promises.
In the ISO 9001 definition of quality policy it is suggested that the eight quality management principles be used as a basis for establishing the quality policy.
One of these principles is the Customer Focus principle. By including in the quality policy the intention to identify and satisfy the needs and expectations of customers and other interested parties and the associated strategy by which this will be achieved, this requirement would be fulfilled. The inclusion of the strategy is important because the policy should guide action and decision. Omitting the strategy may not ensure uniformity of approach and direction.
The standard requires that the quality policy include a commitment to comply with requirements and continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system.
A commitment to comply with requirements means that the organization should undertake to meet the requirements of all interested parties. This means meeting the requirements of customer, suppliers, employees, investors, owners and society. Customer requirements are those either specified or implied by customers or determined by the organization and these are dealt with in more detail under clauses 5.2 and 7.2.1. The requirements of employees are those covered by legislation such as access, space, environmental conditions, equal opportunities and maternity leave but also the legislation appropriate to minority groups such as the disabled and any agreements made with unions or other representative bodies. Investors have rights also and these will be addressed in the investment agreements. The requirements of society are those obligations resulting from laws, statutes, regulations etc.
An organization accepts such obligations when it is incorporated as a legal entity, when it accepts orders from customers, when it recruits employees, when it chooses to trade in regulated markets and when it chooses to use or process materials that impact the environment.
The effectiveness of the management system is judged by the extent to which it fulfils its purpose. Therefore improving effectiveness means improving the capability of the management system. Changes to the management system that improve its capability i.e its ability to deliver outputs that satisfy all the interested parties, are a certain types of change and not all management system changes will accomplish this. This requirement therefore requires top management to pursue changes that bring about an improvement in performance.
ISO 14001 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
ISO 14001 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
The intent of an environmental policy is to state the organization’s commitment to continuous improvement in environmental performance. A strong, clear environmental policy can serve as both a starting point for developing the EMS and a reference point for maintaining continuous improvement.The policy should be evaluated regularly and modified, as necessary, to reflect changing environmental priorities.The policy should function in two ways: (1) within the company, the policy should focus attention on environmental issues associated with company activities, products, and services; and (2) outside the company, the policy is a public commitment to addressing environmental issues and continuously improving environmental performance.The environmental policy must address:• Commitment to compliance with relevant environmental legislation andregulations• Pollution prevention• Continuous improvement
Tips for Developing an Environmental Policy:1. Develop a policy that reflects perspectives of various employees within the company (for example, line worker, owner, wastewater treatment operator, quality inspector, compliance/legal manager, production manager).2. Display the policy statement in view of all employees; the policy should be available to the public and customers if requested and be printed in languages other than English, as appropriate.3. Include top management signatures on the policy to demonstrate understanding and commitment.Purpose This procedure is used to develop and write the company’s environmental policy.
Step 1 The environmental manager will form a policy development team responsible for developing and writing the environmental policy. The policy will address, at a minimum, compliance, pollution prevention, and continuous improvement.
Step 2 The policy development team will review other relevant documents to ensure consistency with other company policies and guide the content and phrasing of the policy. Example documents include the company mission statement and the example environmental policies included in this EMS element.
Step 3 The policy will be displayed in view of all employees and introduced to new employees; the policy will be available in languages other than English, as appropriate, and to the public (on request) and customers (as appropriate).Step 4 The environmental manager will review the environmental policy at least annually, and update it if needed.
Responsible Person: _____________________________________Signature and Date: ______________________________________
Environmental Policy Example 1
It is the policy of COMPANY NAME to conduct its operations in a manner that is environmentally responsible and befitting a good corporate neighbor and citizen.In accordance with this policy, COMPANY NAME complies with all environmental laws and manages all phases of its business in a manner that minimizes the impact of its operations on the environment.To further this policy, COMPANY NAME shall:1. Include environmental requirements in planning and design activities2. Comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations3. Eliminate, or reduce to the maximum practical extent, the release of contaminants into the environment, first through pollution prevention (material substitution and source reduction), then recycling, and finally through treatment and control technologies4. Effectively communicate with company employees, suppliers, regulators, and customers, as well as the surrounding community, regarding the environmental impact of company operations5. Periodically review and demonstrate continuous improvement in the company’s environmental management system
SIGNATURE___________________
Responsible Person______________________
Environmental Policy Sample 2
Effective Date
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
_________________________ IS COMMITTED TO IMPROVE THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT FOR OUR EMPLOYEES, NEIGHBORS, AND FAMILIES.
WE WILL MEET AND OR EXCEED LAWFUL COMPLIANCE THROUGH POLLUTION PREVENTION PRACTICES AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT.
TO IMPLEMENT THIS POLICY WE WILL CREATE AN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO IDENTIFY GOALS, SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENTS AND SAMPLING METHODS.TO SUPPLEMENT THIS POLICY WE WILL INCORPORATE SOURCE REDUCTION THROUGH REUSE, RECYCLING, MATERIAL SUBSTITUTION, NEW AND IMPROVED TECHNOLOGIES, CREATIVE MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL PRACTICES.
TO MAINTAIN THIS POLICY WE WILL PERFORM MANAGEMENT REVIEW, REVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE, EMPLOYEE TRAINING, AND A COMMITMENT AND INVOLVEMENT FROM OUR EMPLOYEES AND MANAGEMENT TO SUPPORT THIS POLICY.
The intent of an environmental policy is to state the organization’s commitment to continuous improvement in environmental performance. A strong, clear environmental policy can serve as both a starting point for developing the EMS and a reference point for maintaining continuous improvement.The policy should be evaluated regularly and modified, as necessary, to reflect changing environmental priorities.The policy should function in two ways: (1) within the company, the policy should focus attention on environmental issues associated with company activities, products, and services; and (2) outside the company, the policy is a public commitment to addressing environmental issues and continuously improving environmental performance.The environmental policy must address:• Commitment to compliance with relevant environmental legislation andregulations• Pollution prevention• Continuous improvement
Tips for Developing an Environmental Policy:1. Develop a policy that reflects perspectives of various employees within the company (for example, line worker, owner, wastewater treatment operator, quality inspector, compliance/legal manager, production manager).2. Display the policy statement in view of all employees; the policy should be available to the public and customers if requested and be printed in languages other than English, as appropriate.3. Include top management signatures on the policy to demonstrate understanding and commitment.Purpose This procedure is used to develop and write the company’s environmental policy.
Step 1 The environmental manager will form a policy development team responsible for developing and writing the environmental policy. The policy will address, at a minimum, compliance, pollution prevention, and continuous improvement.
Step 2 The policy development team will review other relevant documents to ensure consistency with other company policies and guide the content and phrasing of the policy. Example documents include the company mission statement and the example environmental policies included in this EMS element.
Step 3 The policy will be displayed in view of all employees and introduced to new employees; the policy will be available in languages other than English, as appropriate, and to the public (on request) and customers (as appropriate).Step 4 The environmental manager will review the environmental policy at least annually, and update it if needed.
Responsible Person: _____________________________________Signature and Date: ______________________________________
Environmental Policy Example 1
It is the policy of COMPANY NAME to conduct its operations in a manner that is environmentally responsible and befitting a good corporate neighbor and citizen.In accordance with this policy, COMPANY NAME complies with all environmental laws and manages all phases of its business in a manner that minimizes the impact of its operations on the environment.To further this policy, COMPANY NAME shall:1. Include environmental requirements in planning and design activities2. Comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations3. Eliminate, or reduce to the maximum practical extent, the release of contaminants into the environment, first through pollution prevention (material substitution and source reduction), then recycling, and finally through treatment and control technologies4. Effectively communicate with company employees, suppliers, regulators, and customers, as well as the surrounding community, regarding the environmental impact of company operations5. Periodically review and demonstrate continuous improvement in the company’s environmental management system
SIGNATURE___________________
Responsible Person______________________
Environmental Policy Sample 2
Effective Date
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
_________________________ IS COMMITTED TO IMPROVE THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT FOR OUR EMPLOYEES, NEIGHBORS, AND FAMILIES.
WE WILL MEET AND OR EXCEED LAWFUL COMPLIANCE THROUGH POLLUTION PREVENTION PRACTICES AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT.
TO IMPLEMENT THIS POLICY WE WILL CREATE AN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO IDENTIFY GOALS, SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENTS AND SAMPLING METHODS.TO SUPPLEMENT THIS POLICY WE WILL INCORPORATE SOURCE REDUCTION THROUGH REUSE, RECYCLING, MATERIAL SUBSTITUTION, NEW AND IMPROVED TECHNOLOGIES, CREATIVE MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL PRACTICES.
TO MAINTAIN THIS POLICY WE WILL PERFORM MANAGEMENT REVIEW, REVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE, EMPLOYEE TRAINING, AND A COMMITMENT AND INVOLVEMENT FROM OUR EMPLOYEES AND MANAGEMENT TO SUPPORT THIS POLICY.
ISO 14001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS AND IMPACTS
ISO 14001 Environmental Aspects And Impacts
The fundamental purpose of the EMS is to control and reduce the environmental impacts of your facility’s processes and products. For this reason, a critical element of the EMS involves identifying and prioritizing the environmental aspects and impacts associated with your facility. An environmental aspect is an element of an organizations activities, products, or services that can interact with the environment. For example, chrome plating is a metal finishing activity and an associated aspect is chrome air emissions.This aspect may have an impact on the environment in several ways, for example, ambient air quality degradation.The environmental aspects and impacts of your metal finishing operations can be identified, prioritized, and documented in several ways. This Template includes two approaches, either of which can be used during EMS implementation. Use the approach that works best for your circumstances. This process is important because high-priority environmental aspects and impacts will be considered when environmental objectives and targets are established.
Aspects and Impacts Form A — The first approach uses the experience and judgment ofemployees familiar with facility processes to identify the top five environmental issuescurrently facing the facility. These issues and their specific aspects and impacts shouldbe summarized using Aspects and Impacts Form A.
Aspects and Impacts Form B — The second approach uses detailed, structured matricesto list and prioritize environmental aspects and impacts according to the followingcategories:• Environmental Aspects and Impacts: Wastewater• Environmental Aspects and Impacts: Air Emissions• Environmental Aspects and Impacts: Hazardous and Solid Waste• Environmental Aspects and Impacts: Raw Materials• Environmental Aspects and Impacts: Water and Energy
The matrices that comprise Form B will help facility staff identify and document environmental aspects and impacts. The matrices also provide criteria for prioritizing environmental aspects and impacts; this process is important because high-priority environmental aspects and impacts will be considered when environmental objectives and targets are established. One possible way to prioritize environmental aspects and impacts using Form B is described as follows:Step 1:For each aspect and impact, score each prioritization criterion on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates the criterion is very important or relevant to that aspect (for example, the aspect is strictly regulated, is the subject of compliance violations, or is a waste generated in large uantities), and 5 indicates the criterion is relatively unimportant or irrelevant to that aspect (for example, the aspect is an unregulated waste, is generated infrequently, and is inexpensive to manage).Step 2:Add the scores of all criteria for each aspect and write the total in the right-most column of the form.This number indicates the relative priority of the aspect compared to other aspects and impacts in the same category. The lower the total score, the higher the priority.Purpose Of This procedure is used to identify, document, and update the environmental aspects and impacts of facility processes and operations.
Step 1 The environmental manager and other facility personnel selected by the environmental manager are responsible for identifying and prioritizing the environmental aspects and impacts of facility operations during EMS planning and development.Environmental aspects are characteristics of facility processes and products that interact with the environment. Only environmental aspects the company can control or influence will be considered. Environmental impacts are the effects of an organization’s activitie , products or services on the environment.
Step 2 Environmental aspects and impacts will be documented and prioritized.Environmental aspects and impacts will be associated with the following categories:• Wastewater• Air emissions• Hazardous and solid waste• Raw materials• Water and energyHigh-priority environmental aspects and impacts will be considered when environmentalobjectives and targets are set.
Step 3 The environmental manager and other facility personnel will review and updatethe environmental aspects and impacts documentation annually.
Step 4 Environmental aspects and impacts documentation will be retained at the facilityfor at least 2 years.
Responsible Person: _____________________________________Signature and Date: ______________________________________
The fundamental purpose of the EMS is to control and reduce the environmental impacts of your facility’s processes and products. For this reason, a critical element of the EMS involves identifying and prioritizing the environmental aspects and impacts associated with your facility. An environmental aspect is an element of an organizations activities, products, or services that can interact with the environment. For example, chrome plating is a metal finishing activity and an associated aspect is chrome air emissions.This aspect may have an impact on the environment in several ways, for example, ambient air quality degradation.The environmental aspects and impacts of your metal finishing operations can be identified, prioritized, and documented in several ways. This Template includes two approaches, either of which can be used during EMS implementation. Use the approach that works best for your circumstances. This process is important because high-priority environmental aspects and impacts will be considered when environmental objectives and targets are established.
Aspects and Impacts Form A — The first approach uses the experience and judgment ofemployees familiar with facility processes to identify the top five environmental issuescurrently facing the facility. These issues and their specific aspects and impacts shouldbe summarized using Aspects and Impacts Form A.
Aspects and Impacts Form B — The second approach uses detailed, structured matricesto list and prioritize environmental aspects and impacts according to the followingcategories:• Environmental Aspects and Impacts: Wastewater• Environmental Aspects and Impacts: Air Emissions• Environmental Aspects and Impacts: Hazardous and Solid Waste• Environmental Aspects and Impacts: Raw Materials• Environmental Aspects and Impacts: Water and Energy
The matrices that comprise Form B will help facility staff identify and document environmental aspects and impacts. The matrices also provide criteria for prioritizing environmental aspects and impacts; this process is important because high-priority environmental aspects and impacts will be considered when environmental objectives and targets are established. One possible way to prioritize environmental aspects and impacts using Form B is described as follows:Step 1:For each aspect and impact, score each prioritization criterion on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates the criterion is very important or relevant to that aspect (for example, the aspect is strictly regulated, is the subject of compliance violations, or is a waste generated in large uantities), and 5 indicates the criterion is relatively unimportant or irrelevant to that aspect (for example, the aspect is an unregulated waste, is generated infrequently, and is inexpensive to manage).Step 2:Add the scores of all criteria for each aspect and write the total in the right-most column of the form.This number indicates the relative priority of the aspect compared to other aspects and impacts in the same category. The lower the total score, the higher the priority.Purpose Of This procedure is used to identify, document, and update the environmental aspects and impacts of facility processes and operations.
Step 1 The environmental manager and other facility personnel selected by the environmental manager are responsible for identifying and prioritizing the environmental aspects and impacts of facility operations during EMS planning and development.Environmental aspects are characteristics of facility processes and products that interact with the environment. Only environmental aspects the company can control or influence will be considered. Environmental impacts are the effects of an organization’s activitie , products or services on the environment.
Step 2 Environmental aspects and impacts will be documented and prioritized.Environmental aspects and impacts will be associated with the following categories:• Wastewater• Air emissions• Hazardous and solid waste• Raw materials• Water and energyHigh-priority environmental aspects and impacts will be considered when environmentalobjectives and targets are set.
Step 3 The environmental manager and other facility personnel will review and updatethe environmental aspects and impacts documentation annually.
Step 4 Environmental aspects and impacts documentation will be retained at the facilityfor at least 2 years.
Responsible Person: _____________________________________Signature and Date: ______________________________________
Elements of the Six Sigma Framework
Elements Of The Six Sigma Framework
Management strategies, such as TQC, TQM, and Six Sigma, are distinguished from each other by their underlying rationale and framework. As far as the corporate framework of Six Sigma is concerned, it embodies the five elements of top-level management commitment, training schemes, project team activities, measurement system and stakeholder involvement.
Stakeholders include employees, owners, suppliers and customers. At the core of the framework is a formalized improvement strategy with the following five steps: define, measure, analyse, improve and control (DMAIC) which will be explained in detail in Section 2.3. The improvement strategy is based on training schemes, project team activities and measurement system. Top-level management commitment and stakeholder involvement are all inclusive in the framework.
Without these two, the improvement strategy functions poorly. All five elements support the improvement strategy and improvement project teams. Most big companies operate in three parts: R&D, manufacturing, and non-manufacturing service. Six Sigma can be introduced into each of these three parts separately. In fact, the color of Six Sigma could be different for each part. Six Sigma in the R&D part is often called “Design for Six Sigma (DFSS),” “Manufacturing Six Sigma” in manufacturing, and “Transactional Six Sigma (TSS)” in the non-manufacturing service sector. All five elements are necessary for each of the three different Six Sigma functions. However, the improvement methodology, DMAIC, could be modified in DFSS and TSS. These points will be explained in detail in Sections 2.6 and 2.7.2.2 Top-level Management Commitment and Stakeholder Involvement
(1) Top-level management commitment
Launching Six Sigma in a company is a strategic management decision that needs to be initiated by top-level management. All the elements of the framework, as well as the formalized improvement strategy, need top-level management commitment for successful execution. Especially, without a strong commitment on the part of top-level management, the training program and project team activities are seldom successful. Although not directly active in the day-to-day improvement projects, the role of top-level management as leaders, project sponsors and advocates is crucial. Pragmatic management is required, not just lip service, as the top-level management commits itself and the company to drive the initiative for several years and into every corner of the company.
There are numerous pragmatic ways for the CEO (chief executive officer) to manifest his commitment. First, in setting the vision and long-term or short-term goal for Six Sigma, the CEO should play a direct role. Second, the CEO should allocate appropriate resources in order to implement such Six Sigma programs as training schemes, project team activities and measurement system. Third, the CEO should regularly check the progress of the Six Sigma program to determine whether there are any problems which might hinder its success. He should listen to Six Sigma reports and make comments on the progress of Six Sigma. Fourth, he should hold a Six Sigma presentation seminar regularly, say twice a year, in which the results of the project team are presented and good results rewarded financially. Finally, he should hold a Champion Day regularly, say once in every other month, in which Champions (upper managers) are educated by specially invited speakers and he should discuss the progress of Six Sigma with the Champions.
It is also the responsibility of top-level management to set “stretch goals” for the Six Sigma initiative. Stretch goals are tough and demanding, but are usually achievable. Some companies set the stretch goal for process performance at 6 sigma or 3.4 DPMO for all critical-to-customer characteristics.
However, the goals can also be set incrementally, by stating instead the annual improvement rate in process performance.
The industry standard is to reduce DPMO by 50% annually.
(2) Stakeholder involvement
Stakeholder involvement means that the hearts and minds of employees, suppliers, customers, owners and even society should be involved in the improvement methodology of Six Sigma for a company. In order to meet the goal set for improvements in process performance and to complete the improvement projects of a Six Sigma initiative, top-level management commitment is simply not enough. The company needs active support and direct involvement from stakeholders.
Employees in a company constitute the most important group of stakeholders. They carry out the majority of improvement projects and must be actively involved. The Six Sigma management is built to ensure this involvement through various practices, such as training courses, project team activities and evaluation of process performance. Suppliers also need to be involved in a Six Sigma initiative.
A Six Sigma company usually encourages its key suppliers to have their own Six Sigma programs. To support suppliers, it is common for Six Sigma companies to have suppliers sharing their performance data for the products purchased and to offer them participation at in-house training courses in Six Sigma. It is also common for Six Sigma companies to help small suppliers financially in pursuing Six Sigma programs by inviting them to share their experiences together in report sessions of project team activities. The reason for this type of involvement is to have the variation in the suppliers’ products transferred to the company’s processes so that most of the process improvement projects carried out on suppliers’ processes would result in improvement of the performance.
Customers play key roles in a Six Sigma initiative. Customer satisfaction is one of the major objectives for a Six Sigma company. Customers should be involved in specific activities such as identifying the critical-to-customer (CTC) characteristics of the products and processes. CTC is a subset of CTQ from the viewpoint of the customers. Having identified the CTC requirements, the customers are also asked to specify the desired value of the characteristic, i.e., the target value and the definition of a defect for the characteristic, or the specification limits. This vital information is utilized in Six Sigma as a basis for measuring the performance of processes. In particular, the R&D part of a company should know the CTC requirements and should listen to the voice of customers (VOC) in order to reflect the VOC in developing new products.
Management strategies, such as TQC, TQM, and Six Sigma, are distinguished from each other by their underlying rationale and framework. As far as the corporate framework of Six Sigma is concerned, it embodies the five elements of top-level management commitment, training schemes, project team activities, measurement system and stakeholder involvement.
Stakeholders include employees, owners, suppliers and customers. At the core of the framework is a formalized improvement strategy with the following five steps: define, measure, analyse, improve and control (DMAIC) which will be explained in detail in Section 2.3. The improvement strategy is based on training schemes, project team activities and measurement system. Top-level management commitment and stakeholder involvement are all inclusive in the framework.
Without these two, the improvement strategy functions poorly. All five elements support the improvement strategy and improvement project teams. Most big companies operate in three parts: R&D, manufacturing, and non-manufacturing service. Six Sigma can be introduced into each of these three parts separately. In fact, the color of Six Sigma could be different for each part. Six Sigma in the R&D part is often called “Design for Six Sigma (DFSS),” “Manufacturing Six Sigma” in manufacturing, and “Transactional Six Sigma (TSS)” in the non-manufacturing service sector. All five elements are necessary for each of the three different Six Sigma functions. However, the improvement methodology, DMAIC, could be modified in DFSS and TSS. These points will be explained in detail in Sections 2.6 and 2.7.2.2 Top-level Management Commitment and Stakeholder Involvement
(1) Top-level management commitment
Launching Six Sigma in a company is a strategic management decision that needs to be initiated by top-level management. All the elements of the framework, as well as the formalized improvement strategy, need top-level management commitment for successful execution. Especially, without a strong commitment on the part of top-level management, the training program and project team activities are seldom successful. Although not directly active in the day-to-day improvement projects, the role of top-level management as leaders, project sponsors and advocates is crucial. Pragmatic management is required, not just lip service, as the top-level management commits itself and the company to drive the initiative for several years and into every corner of the company.
There are numerous pragmatic ways for the CEO (chief executive officer) to manifest his commitment. First, in setting the vision and long-term or short-term goal for Six Sigma, the CEO should play a direct role. Second, the CEO should allocate appropriate resources in order to implement such Six Sigma programs as training schemes, project team activities and measurement system. Third, the CEO should regularly check the progress of the Six Sigma program to determine whether there are any problems which might hinder its success. He should listen to Six Sigma reports and make comments on the progress of Six Sigma. Fourth, he should hold a Six Sigma presentation seminar regularly, say twice a year, in which the results of the project team are presented and good results rewarded financially. Finally, he should hold a Champion Day regularly, say once in every other month, in which Champions (upper managers) are educated by specially invited speakers and he should discuss the progress of Six Sigma with the Champions.
It is also the responsibility of top-level management to set “stretch goals” for the Six Sigma initiative. Stretch goals are tough and demanding, but are usually achievable. Some companies set the stretch goal for process performance at 6 sigma or 3.4 DPMO for all critical-to-customer characteristics.
However, the goals can also be set incrementally, by stating instead the annual improvement rate in process performance.
The industry standard is to reduce DPMO by 50% annually.
(2) Stakeholder involvement
Stakeholder involvement means that the hearts and minds of employees, suppliers, customers, owners and even society should be involved in the improvement methodology of Six Sigma for a company. In order to meet the goal set for improvements in process performance and to complete the improvement projects of a Six Sigma initiative, top-level management commitment is simply not enough. The company needs active support and direct involvement from stakeholders.
Employees in a company constitute the most important group of stakeholders. They carry out the majority of improvement projects and must be actively involved. The Six Sigma management is built to ensure this involvement through various practices, such as training courses, project team activities and evaluation of process performance. Suppliers also need to be involved in a Six Sigma initiative.
A Six Sigma company usually encourages its key suppliers to have their own Six Sigma programs. To support suppliers, it is common for Six Sigma companies to have suppliers sharing their performance data for the products purchased and to offer them participation at in-house training courses in Six Sigma. It is also common for Six Sigma companies to help small suppliers financially in pursuing Six Sigma programs by inviting them to share their experiences together in report sessions of project team activities. The reason for this type of involvement is to have the variation in the suppliers’ products transferred to the company’s processes so that most of the process improvement projects carried out on suppliers’ processes would result in improvement of the performance.
Customers play key roles in a Six Sigma initiative. Customer satisfaction is one of the major objectives for a Six Sigma company. Customers should be involved in specific activities such as identifying the critical-to-customer (CTC) characteristics of the products and processes. CTC is a subset of CTQ from the viewpoint of the customers. Having identified the CTC requirements, the customers are also asked to specify the desired value of the characteristic, i.e., the target value and the definition of a defect for the characteristic, or the specification limits. This vital information is utilized in Six Sigma as a basis for measuring the performance of processes. In particular, the R&D part of a company should know the CTC requirements and should listen to the voice of customers (VOC) in order to reflect the VOC in developing new products.
Environment Policy In ISO 14001:2004
Environment Policy In ISO 14001:2004
To develop a successful and effective EMS, five key tasks that must be undertaken by management:a. Select an EMS CoordinatorThe selection of an EMS Coordinator is crucial to the success of your EMS. This person will be responsible for developing and implementing the environmental policy and the EMS. Great care must be taken to ensure that the person chosen is well qualified to handle the responsibilities associated with the EMS.b. Perform a gap analysisA gap analysis determines the differences, or gaps, between one system and another. Not only will this analysis identify the gaps, but it also should etermine the size of the gaps. These findings will lead to recommendations, project plans, and the identification of necessary resources for filling the gaps.
c. Prepare a budget, and obtain the appropriate resourcesAfter conducting a gap analysis, the EMS Coordinator will develop a budget that covers the necessary resources to complete an EMS that conforms with ISO 14001. For some organizations, this may mean establishing a budget for the entire process; other organizations may only need to update certain portions of their existing management system.
ISO 14001 Section 4.4.1 requires top management to provide the essential resources to implement, control, and manage the EMS.
d. Select an EMS TeamTop management and the EMS Coordinator may consider creating an EMS Team to assist in developing and implementing the system. This decision should be based on the size of the organization or facility that will be implementing the EMS.
This team should consist of key individuals from various divisions, departments, and operating work areas within the organization who are familiar with the facility, the various processes, and its environmental requirements. Diversity among team members will bring together a pool of expertise and ideas from which to develop and implement the EMS.
e. Develop an environmental policyThe environmental policy is an essential part of an organization’s EMS. The environmental policy must establish the overall direction of the organization in terms of its commitment to environmental responsibility. A policy should also set the foundation and framework for meeting the environmental objectives and targets for the organization.
The ISO 14001 standard establishes certain requirements that an organization’s environmental policy must meet. If your organization already has an environmental policy, review this section to ensure it meets the ISO 14001 requirements.
The first requirement is that top management must establish and define the environmental policy. Note that ISO 14001 does not specifically state that top management must write the policy, only that it be committed to the policy and ensure its implementation.
These actions are essential in constructing a firm foundation for an effective EMS.
To develop a successful and effective EMS, five key tasks that must be undertaken by management:a. Select an EMS CoordinatorThe selection of an EMS Coordinator is crucial to the success of your EMS. This person will be responsible for developing and implementing the environmental policy and the EMS. Great care must be taken to ensure that the person chosen is well qualified to handle the responsibilities associated with the EMS.b. Perform a gap analysisA gap analysis determines the differences, or gaps, between one system and another. Not only will this analysis identify the gaps, but it also should etermine the size of the gaps. These findings will lead to recommendations, project plans, and the identification of necessary resources for filling the gaps.
c. Prepare a budget, and obtain the appropriate resourcesAfter conducting a gap analysis, the EMS Coordinator will develop a budget that covers the necessary resources to complete an EMS that conforms with ISO 14001. For some organizations, this may mean establishing a budget for the entire process; other organizations may only need to update certain portions of their existing management system.
ISO 14001 Section 4.4.1 requires top management to provide the essential resources to implement, control, and manage the EMS.
d. Select an EMS TeamTop management and the EMS Coordinator may consider creating an EMS Team to assist in developing and implementing the system. This decision should be based on the size of the organization or facility that will be implementing the EMS.
This team should consist of key individuals from various divisions, departments, and operating work areas within the organization who are familiar with the facility, the various processes, and its environmental requirements. Diversity among team members will bring together a pool of expertise and ideas from which to develop and implement the EMS.
e. Develop an environmental policyThe environmental policy is an essential part of an organization’s EMS. The environmental policy must establish the overall direction of the organization in terms of its commitment to environmental responsibility. A policy should also set the foundation and framework for meeting the environmental objectives and targets for the organization.
The ISO 14001 standard establishes certain requirements that an organization’s environmental policy must meet. If your organization already has an environmental policy, review this section to ensure it meets the ISO 14001 requirements.
The first requirement is that top management must establish and define the environmental policy. Note that ISO 14001 does not specifically state that top management must write the policy, only that it be committed to the policy and ensure its implementation.
These actions are essential in constructing a firm foundation for an effective EMS.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)